Tsygankov Pavel
-
The Theory Of Human Security: Political Consequences And Lessons For RussiaMoscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science. 2010. 4. p.78-83read more203
-
-
China And Russia's Contemporary Foreign Policy: The Realism Of PartnershipMoscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science. 2011. 4. p.52-62read more238
-
-
Values In World Politics: Theoretical Debates, International Practices, And The Position Of RussiaMoscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science. 2012. 3. p.25-30read more231
-
-
Overcoming "Methodological Nationalism": From The Conversation Between P.a. Tsygankov And U. BeckMoscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science. 2012. 5. p.28-34read more219
-
-
Victory Over Fascism In World War Ii In The Modern Political ContextMoscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science. 2012. 6. p.116-122read more204
-
-
The System Approach In International Relations TheoryMoscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science. 2013. 5. p.3-25read more624
-
-
European Security Through The Lens Of Political RealismMoscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science. 2017. 4. p.7-16read more293
-
The theory of international relations demonstrates the unattainability of absolute security for participants in European and world politics. The juxtaposition of “correct” and “incorrect” approaches to security does not take into account that the very notion of “security” comprises both objective content and subjective meaning. A universal formula for the ultimate solution to the problems in this fi eld does not exist. Insisting on the superiority of “European values” actually renders plans for a common European security community that protects both the EU and Russia from destabilization futile. International security is a continuous process requiring constant dialogue, effort, compliance with treaties and confi dence-building measures.Keywords: European security; security dilemma; political equilibrium; balance of threats
-
-
Geopolitical Foundations of the Anti-Russian Discourse of the European UnionMoscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science. 2020. 5. p.7-22read more940
-
The article provides an analysis of the fundamental foundations of the anti- Russian discourse in the European Union, suggesting possible explanations for its escalation in contemporary European politics, in both the academic and expert community and in the mass media. The author suggests that the anti-Russian discourse in the EU should not be viewed as a series of random coincidences and not even as a coordinated one-time campaign, but rather as a part of an integral geopolitical strategy. This strategy has an impact on the social space (informational, ideological, semantic), within which the anti-Russian discourse is one of the tools of the European Union and NATO expansion to the East, closer to the borders of the Russian Federation. One of the most important reasons for the constant anti- Russian rhetoric is associated with European Union’s problems in achieving its own “strategic autonomy,” i.e. a unifi ed security and defense policy. The growth of European Russophobia is also associated with the desire to gain competitive advantages in the growing economic rivalry on the world stage. Furthermore, the incessant attacks on Russia are rooted in the erosion of the common European identity, the loss of the attractiveness of European values, as they are understood in the modern establishment of the European Union. Finally, the scope of the anti-Russian rhetoric is explained by the diffi culties experienced by the so-called “European solidarity,” the internal cohesion of the European Union as an integral entity.
Keywords: European Union, geopolitics, anti-Russian discourse, fundamental reasons
-
-
The Journal in Political Sciences in the Interconnection of TimesMoscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science. 2021. 5. p.29-49read more336
-
In an article dedicated to the 50th anniversary of the journal “Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Sciences”, we examine the history of its formation and development from 1971 to the present. Despite the changes in the name, caused by cardinal changes in the political life of the country, the journal is characterized by a historical relationship that expresses the logic of political development and its scientifi c understanding. Since the introduction of political science into university education in Russia, the development of the foundations of political science in close connection with the study of topical issues and the development of political science education has become a priority in the journal’s activities. The creation of the Faculty of Political Science at Moscow State University strengthened the role of the journal as a venue for research and the application of results into the practice of pedagogical work. The focus of the journal constant attention is the topic of the domestic and foreign policy of Russia. In this regard, the problems of the transitional nature of the current stage of world development, ways of overcoming its inherent contradictions, dangers and crises are investigated. Another group of questions concerns the relations between the state and the market, the state and civil society, ways to preserve sovereignty and political stability in its diverse dimensions. An important place is given to issues of information and cybersecurity, digital society and the political aspects of social networks. Topics related to ideological currents and the competition of traditions, interests and values are also widely presented in the journal. The combination of academic emphasis with constant attention to topical issues of domestic and world politics, mutual enrichment of theoretical and empirical approaches, theoretical research and applied analysis allowed our journal to achieve good results in domestic and world rankings of journals with the topic “Politics. Political Sciences”, which, of course, is not a reason for slowing down, but instead, an incentive for further development.Keywords: “Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Sciences”; anniversary; the logic of political development; foundations; topical significance; problematique; achievements and prospects
-
-
Foreign Policy Of The State: Features, Process, And Factors Influencing Decision MakingMoscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science. 2022. 2. p.7-30read more1255
-
The foreign policy of the state has its own specifics because its effectiveness depends on many circumstances that go beyond the framework of national sovereignty. Differences in approaches to the analysis of foreign policy, as well as in the definitions that are given to it, are explained by the variety of factors affecting it and its associated “diversity”. In general, foreign policy is both the general course of the state, the basic principles that characterize its position in a foreign environment, and the practical actions or behavior of the state outside its borders, finally, it is a complex, multi-level process of preparing and making appropriate decisions. Often, it is the process of making foreign policy decisions and related organizational, bureaucratic, psychological, and other problems that occupy a central place in the analysis of the state foreign policy. At the same time, for all the importance of the results of the analysis of the decision-making process, they do not give a complete picture of the foreign policy of the state, leaving without due attention its conceptual foundations and the behavior of the state in the international environment. Russian authors, without denying the place that decision-making takes in the foreign policy of the state, proposed to consider its formation and implementation in the unity and continuity of all its stages based on the concept of “ foreign policy process”. At the
same time, the need to pay attention to the dialectics of the factors of the foreign policy process is especially emphasized. In the light of the exacerbated value, culture and politics-based contradictions in the contemporary world, factors of civilizational, political, cultural, and regime nature affecting the foreign policy of states are attracting increasingly growing attention.Keywords: foreign policy; state; decision-making; factors; civilization; culture; political regime
-
-
Fundamentals of Global Competition: Logistics, Technology and Polar Alliances in Past, Present and Future. Part 1Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science. 2023. 4. p.7-43read more363
-
The formation and functioning of various models of the world order has a deep and complex history that does not fit into the traditional chronologically consistent scheme, and these models themselves did not inherit each other, but were combined in varying degrees of harmony. The dynamics of international relations, at least in the medium term, will be determined by the trends observed over the past decades — such as inequality in the levels of economic development, the redistribution of shares of world wealth, the rivalry for global dominance between the United States, gradually losing its position as sole leader, China, Russia and other global players, and finally, the search for new tools balancing the global status quo.
Expansion geopolitics will also remain the dominant trend in the short- to medium-term perspective. One of its striking manifestations is the Belt — Road Initiative, implemented by the PRC. Expansion geopolitics seems to get start most intensively in West Africa. The region, on the one hand, needs large infrastructure investments, on the other hand, — has a number of advantages that could create a production and logistics hub in it, the starting point of a project similar to the Chinese Belt — Road initiative.Keywords: world order; short- and medium-term perspective; geopolitics; geoeconomics; global competition; prognostic scenario
-