Russian International Theory: how to relate ideology and science

The article argues that in conditions of global instability, a national understanding of world realities and the further formation of the Russian international theory (RIT) is not a luxury, but a necessity for the survival and development of the country. At the same time, a special role belongs to applied research, combining the rigor of empirical research and close relation to the ideology of national interests and values. According to the authors, such a combination, defining the boundaries of the national-ideological and general scientific, can protect the RIT from both scientific utopias and ideological isolationism.
In the first section, the authors present their understanding of the ideological and value assumptions about “Russian,” from which one should proceed in the formation of scientific knowledge within the framework of RIT. The second section is devoted to Russian research questions of a contextual and external nature and their specification based on the material of modern world processes. The third section examines the specifics of answering empirical questions by selecting special theories and formulating hypotheses to test them. The conclusion stresses the importance of RIT and the development of applied knowledge for the practical policy of modern Russia.

References

Colgan, J. D. “American Perspectives and Blind Spots on World Politics,” Journal of Global Security Studies, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2019, pp. 300–309.
Danilevskii, N. Ia. Rossiia i Evropa: Vzgliad na kul’turnye i politicheskie otnosheniia Slavianskogo mira k Germano-Romanskomu. St. Petersburg: Glagol: St. Petersburg University Press, 1995.
Eun Yong-Soo. “Beyond ‘the West / non-West Divide’ in IR: How to Ensure Dialogue as Mutual Learning,” The Chinese Journal of International Politics, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2018, pp. 435–449.
Freeden, M. “Ideology and Political Theory,” Journal of Political Ideologies, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2006, pp. 3–22.
Gantman, V. I. (ed.) Sistema, struktura i protsess razvitiia sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. Moscow: Nauka, 1984.
Khrustalev, M. A. Sistemnoe modelirovanie mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. Moscow: MGIMO MID SSSR, 1987.
Lagutina, M., Tsvetkova, N., and Sergunin, A. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Russian International Relations Studies. London: Routledge, 2023.
Lebedeva, M. M. Rossiiskie issledovaniia i obrazovanie v oblasti mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: 20 let spustia. Moscow: Spetskniga, 2013, URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/upload/riac_wp_mo_2.pdf
Lebedeva, M. Russian Studies of International Relations: From the Soviet Past to the Post-Cold-War Present. Stuttgart: Ibidem-Verlag, 2019.
Mannheim, K. Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., Inc.; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd, 1968.
Pantin, V. I., and Lapkin, V. V. Filosofiia istoricheskogo prognozirovaniia: ritmy istorii i perspektivy mirovogo razvitiia v pervoi polovine 21 veka. Dubna: Feniks+, 2006.
Reisner, L. I., and Simoniia, N. A. (eds.) Evoliutsiia vostochnykh obshchestv: sintez traditsionnogo i sovremennogo. Moscow: Nauka, 1984.
Shih Chihyu et al. China and International Theory: The Balance of Relationships. London: Routledge, 2019.
Tsygankov, A. P. Russkaia mezhdunarodnaia teoriia. 2nd ed. Moscow: RUSAINS, 2018.
Tsygankov, A. P., and Tsygankov, P. A. “National Ideology and IR Theory: Three Incarnations of the ‘Russian Idea’,” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2010, pp. 663–686.
Tsygankov, A. P., and Tsygankov, P. A. (eds.) Rossiiskaia nauka mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: novye napravleniia. Moscow: PER SE, 2005.
Tsygankov, A. P., and Tsygankov, P. A. Global’nost’ i samobytnost’: Russkaia ideia i mezhdunarodnaia teoriia v 21 veke. Moscow: Prospekt, 2024.
Tsygankov, A. P., Tsygankov, P. A., and Gonzales, H. “Putin’s ‘Global Hybrid War’: U.S. Experts, Russia, and the Atlantic Council,” Russia in Global Affairs, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2021, pp. 146–172.
Weber, M. “Nauka kak prizvanie i professiia,” Weber, M. Izbrannye proizvedeniia. Moscow: Progress, 1990, pp. 707–735.