Ukhanov Anton D.

Ukhanov A.
Vladivostok State University
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Lomonosov Moscow State University
E-mail: ukhanov@polit.msu.ru
Moscow, Russia
-
Law On The Field Of Truth And Politics: Prescriptivism And Descriptivism In Carl Schmitt And Hans Kelsen’s Political And Legal ThoughtMoscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science. 2022. N 1. p.100-114read more957
-
The article examines the political and legal thought of Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt in the context of the opposition of descriptivity and prescriptivity. The comparison of the presented doctrines in this aspect is based not only on the presence of antagonism between them, but proceeds from the fact that a discussion existed for a long time between the thinkers. Although their discussion devoted to sovereignty, democracy and the guarantor of the constitution, nevertheless each time, it exposed methodological differences in the views of jurists. At the same time, in a broader ideological and theoretical perspective, such an aspect of comparison fits into the problem of the descriptive and prescriptive status of political and legal science. Thus, an appeal to the chosen topic allows us to deepen knowledge both about the vicissitudes of the relationship between the pure doctrine of law by G. Kelsen and the doctrine of decision by C. Schmitt, and to offer a theoretical model for resolving the descriptive-prescriptive conflict, which arises from the desire to reconcile the positions of thinkers.Keywords: truth; description and prescription; normativity; politics; law; doctrine of decision; pure doctrine of law
-
-
Ideological Platforms in the Context of Digital Transformation: Classical and Modern Forms of Thinking about the Digital FutureMoscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science. 2025. N 4. p.31-52read more44
-
Digital transformation, which is one of the key trends in the development of the modern world, affects not only the social structure of society in its political, economic, legal, etc. It also has a significant impact on the ideological and semantic change of ideological (value-worldview) platforms, through which not only social processes are conceptualized, but also the image of the future is designed and constructed. These platforms include neoliberalism, neo-Marxism, neo-anarchism, and neoconservatism. At the same time, in socio-political discourse, there is not only an adaptation of classical value-normative models to digital reality, but also the formation of a new futuristic socio-political platform, built entirely around the construction of an innovative digital future of man and society. The article offers an analysis of the ongoing changes in the value and semantic content of ideological platforms in the context of digital transformation, and also examines modern forms of thinking about the digital future, the role and place of man in the new interactive reality.Keywords: digital transformation; ideological platforms; neoliberalism; neoanarchism; neoconservatism; the future
-
