Law On The Field Of Truth And Politics: Prescriptivism And Descriptivism In Carl Schmitt And Hans Kelsen’s Political And Legal Thought

Abstract

The article examines the political and legal thought of Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt in the context of the opposition of descriptivity and prescriptivity. The comparison of the presented doctrines in this aspect is based not only on the presence of antagonism between them, but proceeds from the fact that a discussion existed for a long time between the thinkers. Although their discussion devoted to sovereignty, democracy and the guarantor of the constitution, nevertheless each time, it exposed methodological differences in the views of jurists. At the same time, in a broader ideological and theoretical perspective, such an aspect of comparison fits into the problem of the descriptive and prescriptive status of political and legal science. Thus, an appeal to the chosen topic allows us to deepen knowledge both about the vicissitudes of the relationship between the pure doctrine of law by G. Kelsen and the doctrine of decision by C. Schmitt, and to offer a theoretical model for resolving the descriptive-prescriptive conflict, which arises from the desire to reconcile the positions of thinkers.

References

Agamben, G. Chto takoe povelevat’. Moscow: Griundrisse, 2013.
Alekseeva, T. A. Sovremennaia politicheskaia mysl’ (XX–XXI vv.): Politicheskaia teoriia i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia. 2nd ed. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2018.
Antonov, M. V. “Chistoe uchenie o prave protiv estestvennogo prava?” Hans Kelsen: chistoe uchenie o prave, spravedlivosti i estestvennoe pravo, ed. M. V. Antonov. St. Petersburg: Alef-press, 2015, pp. 7–106.
Boitsova, O. Iu. “Model’ «troistvennoi normativnosti» kak instrument issledovaniia normativizma,” Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 12. Politicheskie nauki, No. 4, 2006, pp. 32–44.
Diner, D., and Stolleis, M. (eds.) Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt. A Juxtaposition. Gerlingen: Bleicher, 1999.
Hayek, F. von. Pravo, zakonodatel’stvo i svoboda: Sovremennoe ponimanie liberal’nykh printsipov spravedlivosti i politiki. Moscow: IRISEN, 2006.
Jestaedt, M. “Vvedenie v chistoe uchenie o prave Hansa Kelsena,” Hans Kelsen: chistoe uchenie o prave, spravedlivosti i estestvennoe pravo, ed. M. V. Antonov. St. Petersburg: Alef-press, 2015, pp. 621–658.
Kelsen, H. “Chistoe uchenie o prave: vvedenie v problematiku nauki o prave,” Hans Kelsen: chistoe uchenie o prave, spravedlivosti i estestvennoe pravo, ed. M. V. Antonov. St. Petersburg: Alef-press, 2015, pp. 107–240.
Kelsen, H. “Kto dolzhen byt’ garantom konstitutsii?” Schmitt, C. Gosudarstvo: pravo i politika, transl. O. V. Kil’diushov. Moscow: Territoriia budushchego, 2013, pp. 359–410.
Kelsen, H. “Nauka i politika,” transl. A. B. Didikin, and E. A. Vakatova, Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2020, pp. 183–209.
Mehring, R. “Staatsrechtslehre, Rechtslehre, Verfassungslehre: Carl Schmitt Auseinandersetzung mit Hans Kelsen,” Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, Vol. 80, No. 2, 1994, pp. 191–202.
Neumann, V. “Theologie als Staatsrechtswissenschaftliches Argument: Hans Kelsen und Carl Schmitt,” Der Staat, Vol. 47, No. 2, 2008, pp. 163–186.
Paulson, S. L. “Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt: Growing Discord, Culminating in the ‘Guardian’ Controversy of 1931,” The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt, eds. J. Meirehenrich, and O. Simons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 510–546.
Paulson, S. L. “Sushchnost’ idei pravovogo pozitivizma,” Pravovedenie, No. 4, 2011, pp. 32–49.
Schmitt, C. “Novye printsipy dlia pravovoi praktiki,” Schmitt, C. Gosudarstvo i politicheskaia forma, eds. V. V. Anashvili, and O. V. Kil’diushov. Moscow: HSE University Press, 2010, pp. 259–262.
Schmitt, C. Constitutional Theory, ed. J. Seater. Durham; London: Duke University Press, 2008.
Schmitt, C. Gosudarstvo: pravo i politika, transl. O. V. Kil’diushova. Moscow: Territoriia budushchego, 2013.
Schmitt, C. Politicheskaia teologiia, ed. A. F. Filippov. Moscow: Kanon-Press-Ts: Kuchkovo pole, 2000.
Schmitt, C. Politicheskii romantizm. Moscow: Praksis, 2015.
Schmitt, C. Poniatie politicheskogo. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2016.
Strauss, L. Estestvennoe pravo i istoriia. Moscow: Vodolei, 2007.
Vetiutnev, Iu. Iu. “H. Kelsen i problema pozitivistskoi aksiologii prava, ”Normativnaia teoriia Hansa Kelsena i razvitie iurisprudentsii v Evrope i SShA (k 40-letiiu so dnia smerti H. Kelsena): Materialy VII ezhegodnoi Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Ivanovo, 8–12 oktiabria 2013 goda, ed. E. L. Potseluev. Ivanovo: Izdatel’stvo IvGU, 2015, pp. 110–115.
Vinx, L. The Guardian of Constitution. Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.