Shaveko Nikolay Aleksandrovich
Kandidat of Law, Researcher, Udmurt Subdivision, Institute of Philosophy of Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ul. Sof’i Kovalevskoy 16, Ekaterinburg 620108, Russia)
-
Ethnocultural Justice in the National StateMoscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science. 2020. 1. p.31-50read more757
-
The purpose of the article is to consider the theoretical problems of coexistence and interaction of the culture of the titular ethnic group and the cultures of ethnic minorities in the national state. To this purpose the author analyzes the phenomenon of the national state in a historical aspect, uses sociological data, and also analyzes international treaties, analyzes various points of view of scientists. It is stated that the common civil (political) culture in the national state (national culture) has a supra-ethnic character and does not express the interests of any particular ethnic group, including the titular one, at the same time it replaces ethnic cultures, calling into question their full development. A number of arguments are presented in support of the existence and domination of the national culture. It is argued that the national state inevitably protects certain concepts of the good, but this should not lead to anyone’s discrimination. The author concludes that the presence of a national morally colored policy can paradoxically be combined with liberalism, in particular, if such a policy is objectively necessary for ensuring rights and freedoms. As for ethnic cultures, the author sees the fair rules of their interaction in ensuring that each of them, through deliberative procedures, can infl uence the changing national identity.
Keywords: justice; national state; titular nation; ethnos; communitarianism; liberalism; the concept of good
-