The Collapse Of The Soviet Union As A Subject Of Memory Politics: Party Actors And Their Narratives

Abstract

The article defines the specifics of the actor approach in the context of the study of memory policy, and also analyzes the specifics of political parties as mnemonic actors. The collapse of the Soviet Union is used as a historical event demonstrating the difference between the symbolic trajectories of political parties. Based on an analysis of party election programs, the dynamics of ideas about the collapse of the Soviet Union among the parliamentary parties of the VIII convocation was analyzed. The LDPR and the Communist Party of the Russian Federation turned out to be the most active in terms of the implementation of the memory policy, while the rest of the parties showed a weak interest in updating and interpreting the collapse of the Soviet Union as an element of the party’s memory policy. Such differences may be related to the desire of parties to increase their political status by including their own history in a more significant political context, so those parties that arose in the 2000s are not interested in the symbolic use and appropriation of images of the Soviet past. In addition, it is worth considering generational changes in party elites, due to which the traumaticity of perception of the collapse of the Soviet Union gradually decreases as changes in the composition of governing bodies.

References

Bernhard, M., and Kubik, J. “A Theory of the Politics of Memory,” Twenty Years after Communism: The Politics of Memory and Commemoration, eds. M. Bernhard, and J. Kubik. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 7–34.
Linchenko, A., and Anikin, D. “The Political Uses of the Past in Modern Russia: The Images of the October Revolution 1917 in the Politics of Memory of Russian Parties, ”Journal European Politics and Society, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2020, pp. 356–370.
Malinova, O. Iu. “Avgustovskii putch 1991 goda i raspad SSSR v politicheskoi pamiati sovremennoi Rossii: evoliutsiia sopernichaiushchikh narrativov,” Tempus et Memoria, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2021, pp. 19–26.
Malinova, O. Iu. “Kommemoratsiia istoricheskikh sobytii kak instrument simvolicheskoi politiki: vozmozhnosti sravnitel’nogo analiza,” Politiia, No, 4, 2017, pp. 6–22.
Timshina, E. L. “Ogliadyvaias’ nazad: obraz Sovetskogo Soiuza v istoricheskoi politike partii (po materialam vyborov v Gosudarstvennuiu Dumu RF VI i VII sozyvov), ”Genesis: Istoricheskie issledovaniia, No. 3, 2021, pp. 37–52.
Timshina, E. L. “Problema raspada SSSR v narrativakh politicheskikh partii Rossii, ”Istoricheskii zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniia, No. 6, 2021, pp. 121–134.
Touraine, A. Vozvrashchenie cheloveka deistvuiushchego: Ocherk sotsiologii. Moscow: Nauchnyi mir, 1998.