Conceptual Modeling Of The Chinese Politicalmentality (part 2)

Abstract

In this second part of their article the authors examine the particularities of power in the Chinese ritualistic society, it impersonalism, the mental capacity of the political community and the problems of its modernization. The article concludes that beginning in the second half of the 20th century, China sought for the first time in its history to combine adaptive-imitative and reproductive-utilitarian tradition with the realization of a subjective role, adapting and repeating the lessons of the achievements of the Soviet Union and copying the principles of economy, the turnover of political elites and standards of consumer civilization from referenced subjects of the West. Keeping the basics of Chinese identity, taking from outside and calculating mental models, the Chinese Communist Party is organizing the construction of a bourgeois society on borrowed models. In the 21st century the Chinese mentality, with its pragmatism, orientation towards material benefits, Sino-centrism and arrogance is not producing innovation and does not offer the world civilizational alternatives, creative ideas, cultural landmarks, philosophical meanings or images of a desirable future.

References

Allabert, A. V. “Rol’ konfutsianskikh tsennostei v formirovanii moral’no-nravstvennogo oblika sovremennogo kitaiskogo rukovoditelia, ”Vostok, No. 4, 2005, pp. 83–95.
Borsoev, B. “Kaifynskie evrei — iudeiskaia obshchina v Kitae,” ARD, February 25, 2015, URL: http://asiarussia.ru/articles/6262
Chen’, Ts. “Postavtoritarnaia modernizatsiia: problematizatsiia poniatiia na primerakh stran konfutsianskoi tsivilizatsii,” Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik, No. 53, 2015, pp. 107–131.
Confucius. Lun Yu (Besedy i Suzhdeniia). Moscow: Vostochnaia literatura, 2001.
Deliusin, L. P. “Traditsii i sovremennost’ (k postanovke problemy),” Kitai: traditsii i sovremennost’, ed. L. P. Deliusin. Moscow: Nauka, 1976, pp. 3–11.
Deng Xiaoping. Izbrannoe, Vol. 2: 1975−1982. Pekin: Izdatel’stvo literatury na inostrannykh iazykakh, 1985.
Deviatov, A. P. “Novyi istoricheskii start Kitaia. Po itogam 3-go Plenuma TsK KPK 18-go sozyva 9–12.11.13,” Mirovozzrenie russkoi tsivilizatsii, December 8, 2013, URL: https://www.razumei.ru/lib/article/2067
Deviatov, A. P. Krasnyi drakon. Kitai i Rossiia v dvadtsat’ pervom veke. Moscow: Algoritm, 2002.
Dil, J. N. “Po sledam dolgosrochnoi kitaiskoi strategii,” INOSMI.RU, October 21, 2013, URL: http://inosmi.ru/world/20131021/213982844.html
Fan’ Iui. “Kitai ne stanet sverkhderzhavoi, poka liudi ne budut doveriat’ ego produktsii,” Velikaia Epokha, June 11, 2015, URL: http://www.epochtimes.ru/kitaj-nestanet-
sverhderzhavoj-poka-lyudi-ne-budut-doveryat-ego-produktsii–98987134/
Fukuyama, F. “Konfutsianstvo i demokratiia, ”Russkii zhurnal, No. 12, 1997, URL: http://old.russ.ru/journal/predely/97-11-25/fuku.htm
Ivanova, Iu. V. Traditsii i ikh rol’ v politicheskoi zhizni obshchestva: Disserta tsiia … kandidata filosofskikh nauk. Moscow, 1994.
Johnston, R. F. Twilight in the Forbidden City. 4th ed. Vancouver: Soul Care Publishing, 2008.
Khoros, V. G. “Popytka sinteza razlichnykh srezov kitaiskoi tsivilizatsii,” Kitaiskaia tsivilizatsiia v globaliziruiushchemsia mire, Vol. 2. Moscow: IMEMO RAN, 2014, pp. 26–86.
Korolev, A. E. “Moskovskii dogovor 1896 goda: tainye stranitsy russko-kitaiskikh otnoshenii, ”Metamorfozy istorii: Nauchnyi al’manakh, Vol. 2. Pskov: Pskovskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 2002, pp. 55–93.
Kril, Kh. G. Stanovlenie gosudarstvennoi vlasti v Kitae. Imperiia Zapadnaia Chzhou. St. Petersburg: Evraziia, 2001.
Lempton, D. “Sistema vlasti v Kitae,” Rossiia v global’noi politike, No. 1, 2014, pp. 103–113.
Liu Shing-I. Die Begründung des Rechtes und des Staates nach der klassischen chinesischen Philisophie — im Vergleich mit den Grundgedanken der klassischen abendländischen Naturrechteslehre: Dissertation. München: Universität München, 1983.
Lugvin, S. B. “Kitaiskaia gosudarstvennaia biurokratiia kak rezul’tat transformatsionnykh protsessov drevnekitaiskogo obshchestva, ”Vestnik Gomel’skogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta imeni P.O. Sukhogo, No. 3, 2000, pp. 89–95.
Maliavin, V. V. Imperiia uchenykh. Moscow: Evropa, 2007.
Maliavin, V. V. Kitaiskaia tsivilizatsiia. Moscow: Astrel’ AST, 2001.
Marinov, M. B. “Printsipy kitaiskogo strategicheskogo myshleniia,” Teoriia i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiia, No. 2, 2009, pp. 55−62.
Maslov, A. A. Kitai: kolokol’tsa v pyli. Stranstviia maga i intellektuala. Moscow: Aleteiia, 2003.
Mel’nikov, A. P. Natsional’nye modeli politicheskoi kul’tury. Minsk: RIVSh, 2013.
Mikheev, M. (ed.) Kitai: ugrozy, riski, vyzovy razvitiiu. Moscow: Moskovskii tsentr Karnegi, 2005.
Omurova, B. N. “Osnovnye kharakteristiki politicheskoi kul’tury Kitaia,” Vestnik Kyrgyzsko-Rossiiskogo slavianskogo universiteta, Vol. 14, No. 6, 2014, pp. 182–184.
Perelomov, L. S. (ed.) Kniga Pravitelia oblasti Shan. Moscow: Ladomir, 1993.
Perelomov, L. S. (ed.) Konfutsianskoe “Chetveroknizhie” (“Sy shu”). Moscow: Vostochnaia literatura, 2004.
Perelomov, L. S. “Traditsii v politicheskoi kul’ture Kitaia,” Kitai v dialoge tsivilizatsii: K 70-letiiu akademika M. L. Titarenko, ed. S. L. Tikhvinskii. Moscow: Pamiatniki istoricheskoi mysli, 2004, pp. 577–584.
Perelomov, L. S. Konfutsianstvo i legizm v politicheskoi istorii Kitaia. Moscow: Nauka, 1981.
Pisarev, A. A. “Vkliuchenie Kitaiskoi imperii v mirovye ekonomicheskie, politicheskie i dukhovnye sviazi,” Istoriia Kitaia, ed. A. V. Meliksetova. 2nd ed. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola, 2002, pp. 296–342.
Pochagina, O. V. Modeli semeinoi organizatsii v Kitae i na Filippinakh. Moscow: Institut Dal’nego Vostoka RAN, 1997.
Rakitianskii, N. M. “Fenomen anglo-amerikanskoi mental’noi ekspansii v kontekste psikhologii very,” Informatsionnye voiny, No. 4, 2009, pp. 78−89.
Romadina, T. I. Epokha kolonializma v istorii stran Vostoka. Bratsk: GOU VPO “BrGU”, 2009.
Rusakov, R. Dykhanie drakonov (Rossiia, Kitai i evrei). Moscow: Moskvitianin, 1995.
Short, F. Mao Tszedun. Moscow: AST, 2001. Solov’ev, V. S. Sobranie sochinenii: In 10 vol., Vol. 6. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg: Knigoizdatel’skoe tovarishchestvo «Prosveshchenie», 1914.
Sun’ Ziqi. Transformatsiia “obraza geroia” v sovremennoi politicheskoi kommunikatsii Kitaia: Diplomnaia rabota. M., 2014.
Titarenko, M. L. (ed.) Dukhovnaia kul’tura Kitaia: Entsiklopediia: In 5 vol., Vol. 1: Filosofiia. Moscow: Vostochnaia literatura, 2006.
Tsar’kov, I. I. “Legitimatsionnye resursy politicheskogo prinuzhdeniia gosudarstv drevnikh tsivilizatsii (iz istorii politicheskikh i pravovykh uchenii),” Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta imeni V.N. Tatishcheva, No. 2 (78), 2013, pp. 219–228.
Turygin, S. A.; Dobrodeeva, I. Iu., and Guchenko, K. D. Konfutsianstvo v Kitae: problemy i perspektivy. Shuia: Shuiskii filial IvGU, 2014.
Vinogradov, A. V. Kitaiskaia model’ modernizatsii. Poiski novoi identichnosti. Moscow: Pamiatniki istoricheskoi mysli, 2005.
Voropaev, D. S. Kitaiskaia model' politicheskoi modernizatsii v kontekste fenomena koinvoliutsii tsivilizatsii. Moscow: Izdatel' A.B. Vorob’ev, 2011.
Zhamsaev, M. B. Traditsii legizma i konfutsianstva v politicheskoi kul’ture Kitaia: Avtoreferat dissertatsii … kandidata filosofskikh nauk. Ulan-Ude, 2005.
Zhou Zhenghuan. Liberal Rights and Political Culture. Envisioning Democracy in China. London: Routledge, 1999.
[Chinese Encyclopedia of Political science]. 1992.
GDP 1.4 [“Why did Peasants Rebelled Regularly, 1.4 Times a Year, in the Song Dynasty Having High GDP?”], [Fenghuang Wang], 03, 14, 2014, URL: http://cq.ifeng.com/zhuanti/naoshi/lishi/detail_2014_03/14/1983223_0.shtml
[Liu Yuli], [“The ‘Intelligence-Loving’ Philosophy and the ‘Pragmatic’ Confucian: Also Discussion on the Misunderstanding of the Studies of Confucian Thought in Western Countries”], [Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition)], 8, 5, 2005, 52–56.
[Liu Zehua], [“Comparison of Ancient Chinese and Western Political Theories”], [People’s Daily], 06, 23, 2015, 7, URL: http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb//html/2015-06/23/nw.D110000renmrb_20150623_2-07.htm
[Song Huaichang]. [The Crisis of Chinese People’s Thinking]. 2010.
[Zhang Ming]. [“The Empire of China: the Sketchy Thoughts of the System”]. URL: http://www.gongfa.com/zhangmingzhonghuadiguo.htm
[Xu Ling]. [“An Analysis of the Reasons for the Filial Piety in the Han Dynasty”], [Journal of Shangqiu Teachers College], 23, 4, 2007, 58–61.
[Li Changeng]. [“Active Reform: An Ideal Choice for China’s Social Transformation”], [Jiangsu Social Sciences], 4, 2014, URL: http://people.chinareform.org.cn/L/lichanggeng/Article/201408/t20140824_205142.htm
[Chen Baoliang]. [“The Historical Cause of Chinese Offi cial Consciousness,”] [Zhongzhou Journal], 2, 2014, URL: http://www.zhongdaonet.com/NewsInfo.aspx?id=9940