ISSN 0868-4871
En Ru
ISSN 0868-4871
Decentralization: The Evolution Of The Concept’s Interpretation

Decentralization: The Evolution Of The Concept’s Interpretation

Abstract

This article examines decentralization in its historical and political context. The main objective is to analyze the evolution of the concept in the light of changes in various institutional design forms. The emergence of the decentralized system of management in France, aimed at engaging citizens in the political process and political decision-making while expanding their political rights, led to the creation of a new form of the political organization of power. A review of the historical and geopolitical context highlights three stages in interpreting the concept of decentralization: as self-governance on the local level, as a regionalization incentive and as a multidimensional concept that includes both the encouragement of self- governance and the redistribution of powers between different levels of government in the political, administrative and financial-economic arenas.

References

Bardan, P., and Mookerjee, D. Decentralization and Local Governance in Developing Countries: A Comparative Perspective.Cambridge: MIT Press, 2008.
Bardhan, P. “Decentralization of Governance and Development,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2002, pp. 185–205.
Bell, D. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books, 1999.
Brancati, D. “The Origins and Strengths of Regional Parties,” British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2008, pp. 135–159.
Cheema, G. S., and Rondinelli, D. Decentralization and Development: Policy Implementation in Developing Countries. Beverly Hills: Sage Publication, 1983.
Dahl, R. On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000.
De Winter, L. and Türsan, H. (eds.) Regionalist Parties in Western Europe. London: Routledge, 1998.
Dickovick, J. T. “Centralism and “Decentralization” in Unitary States: A Comparative Analysis of Peru and Senegal, ”Journal of Public and International Affairs, Vol. 14, 2003, pp. 1–30.
Falleti, T. “A Sequential Theory of Decentralization: Latin American Cases in Comparative Perspective,” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 99, No. 3, 2005, pp. 327–346.
Falleti, T. G. Decentralization and Subnational Politics in Latin America. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Green, A. “Managing Human Resources in a Decentralized Context,” East Asia Decentralizes: Making Local Government Work in Asia. Washington: World Bank, 2005, pp. 129–155.
Hechter, M. “The Dynamics of Secession,” Acta Sociologica, Vol. 35, 1992, pp. 267–283.
Horowitz, D. L. Ethnic Groups in Confl ict. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.
Iakovlev, N. N. (ed.) Federalist: Politicheskie esse A. Hamilton, J. Madison i J. Jay: Transl. Moscow: Izdatel’skaia gruppa Progress-Litera, 1994.
Lalor, J. J. Cyclopaedia of Political Science, Political Economy, and of the Political History of the United States by the best American and European Authors. New York: Maynard, Merrill, & Co., 1899, URL: http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/lalor-cyclopaediaof-political-science-political-economy-vol-1-abdication-duty
Leroux, R., and Hart, D. M. (eds.) French Liberalism in the 19th Century: An Anthology. London: Routledge, 2012.
Malesky, E.; Nguyen, C., and Tran, A. “The Impact of Recentralization on Public Services: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis of the Abolition of Elected Councils in Vietnam, ”American Political Science Review, Vol. 108, No. 1, 2014, pp. 144–168.
Moreno, L. The Federalization of Spain: The Cass Series in Regional and Federal Studies. London: Portland, 2001.
Neudorfer, B., and Neudorfer, N. “Decentralization and Political Corruption: Disaggregating Regional Authority,” Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2015, pp. 24–50.
North, D. Instituty, institutsional’nye izmeneniia i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki, transl. A. N. Nesterenko. Moscow: Fond ekonomicheskoi knigi «Nachala», 1997.
Ribot, J.; Agrawal, A., and Larson, A. “Recentralization While Decentralizing: How National Governments Reappropriate Forest Resources,” World Development, Vol. 34, No. 11, 2006, pp. 1864–1886.
Rodden, J. Hamilton’s Paradox. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Schmidt, V. A. Democratizing France: The Political and Administrative History of Decentralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Schneider, A. “Decentralization: Conceptualization and Measurement,” Studies in Comparative International Development, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2013, pp. 32–56.
Shutov, A. Iu. Rossiiskoe zemstvo i evropeiskie traditsii mestnogo samoupravleniia (formirovanie predstavitel’stva v mestnom samoupravlenii Rossii i Evropy vtoroi poloviny XIX — nachala XX veka). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 2011.
Treisman, D. The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
White, R., and Smoke, P. “East Asia East Decentralizes,” Asia Decentralizes: Making Local Government Work in Asia. Washington: World Bank, 2005, pp. 1–24.
PDF, ru

Keywords: decentralization; delegation; redistribution; self-governance; evolution; historical context

Available in the on-line version with: 15.10.2016

To cite this article
Number 5, 2016