ISSN 0868-4871
En Ru
ISSN 0868-4871
The Us Indo-pacific Strategy: Goals, Logic Of Construction And Consequences For The East Asian Situation

The Us Indo-pacific Strategy: Goals, Logic Of Construction And Consequences For The East Asian Situation

Abstract

This article analyses the objectives of the US Indo-Pacific strategy, the logic of its construction, and the impact on the East Asian region from Chinese perspectives. Under the administration of D. Trump relations between the United States and China are characterized by the growth of confrontational moods. The Biden administration inherited the political thinking of the Trump administration and continued to implement the Indo-Pacific strategy. From a theoretical point of view, this strategy is based on realpolitik principles. It was influenced by both the geopolitical theory of sea power and the geographical concept of the Indo-Pacific region by K. Haushofer. At the present time a multi-level theoretical and ideological framework has been developed to justify the implementation of the US Indo-Pacific strategy. Analyzing the practice of its implementation, the author characterizes the role of traditional US allies in the Asia-Pacific region (Japan and South Korea), and also considers the importance of the Taiwan issue. The implementation of the US Indo-Pacific Strategy has led to changes in the situation in East Asia in terms of politics and security.

References

Biden, J. R., Jr. “Why America Must Lead again Rescuing U.S. Foreign Policy after Trump, ”Foreign Affairs, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2020, pp. 64–76.
Doshi, R. “The Long Game: China’s Grand Strategy to Displace American Order, ”BROOKINGS, August 2, 2021, URL: https://www.brookings.edu/essay/the-long-gamechinas-grand-strategy-to-displace-american-order/
Ho, B. “Understanding Chinese Exceptionalism: China’s Rise, Its Goodness, and Greatness,” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2014, pp. 164–176.
Insisa, A., and Pugliese, G. “The Free and Open Indo-Pacific versus the Belt and Road: Spheres of Influence and Sino-Japanese Relations,” The Pacific Review, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2020, pp. 557–585.
Jung Sung Chul, Lee Jaehyon, and Lee Ji-Yong. “The Indo-Pacific Strategy and US Alliance Network Expandability: Asian Middle Powers’ Positions on Sino-US Geostrategic Competition in Indo-Pacific Region,” Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 30, No. 127, 2021, pp. 53–68.
Norrlöf, C. “The Ibn Khaldûn Trap and Great Power Competition with China,” The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2021, P. 7–28.
Strel’tsov, D. V. “Indo-Tikhookeanskii region kak novaia real’nost’ global’noi sistemy mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. ”Mezhdunarodnaia zhizn’, No. 8, 2018, pp. 65–74.
Sukin, L., and Dalton, T. “Reducing Nuclear Salience: How to Reassure Northeast Asian Allies,” The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2021, pp. 143–158.
Xiang, L. “US-China Relations in the Shadow of Spengler,” Survival, Vol. 63, No. 3, 2021, pp. 45–53.
[Qin Yaqing]. [“The Transformation of the U.S. Strategy toward China and the Trend of Relations,”] [People’s Forum — Academic Frontiers], No. 15, 2021.
PDF, ru

Keywords: Indo-Pacific Strategy; U.S.; China; East Asia; security

Available in the on-line version with: 15.10.2022

To cite this article
Number 5, 2022