Post-Сovid World And Global Information Society Development: Perspective For Preservation Of Integrated Globality

The modern information society that is based upon digital integrated communications was transformed in recent years by current global political and economic trends into the central element the system of the globalization that provides for its preservation as an important factor at least at the level of philosophical and civilizational identity and perspective. But informational society provides for development of globalization at the practical level by creating conditions for stable functioning of the critical branches of global economy (global finances) and spheres of social development (socio-cultural communications). But the informational society is itself the object of pressure from within and outside that is a product of contradictions emerged as the result of system’s development as well as the result of competition of the major global and sub-global players. Under the conditions of the emerging crisis of globalization these trends convert the information society into the major element of the interstate competition but not only on the level of propaganda but also in the spheres that directly affect the major elements of the development of the post-global architecture of the world. The major issue in this regard is the prognosis of the major directions of development of the global informational society and clarification of the major point of localized bifurcation in its development but what is most important — is the answer to the question whether the preservation of the integrated information society as a global and post-spacial phenomenon is possible in principle.

References

Allison, G. Obrechennye voevat’, transl. Moscow: AST, 2019.
Beck, U. Kosmopoliticheskoe mirovozzrenie, transl. Moscow: Tsentr issledovanii postindustrial’nogo obshchestva, 2008.
Bronnikov, I. A., and Gorbachev, M. V. “Protestnyi potentsial samoorganizatsii rossiiskikh grazhdan v usloviiakh stanovleniia novykh informatsionnykh institutov i mediastruktur,” Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 12. Politicheskie nauki, No. 5, 2020, pp. 23–35.
Castells, M. Vlast’ kommunikatsii, transl. Moscow: The Higher School of Economics Publishing House, 2016.
Evstaf’ev, D. G., and Tsyganova, L. A. “Postglobal’noe sotsiokul’turnoe razvitie: prostranstvennyi aspekt,” Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, No. 6, 2020, pp. 19–34.
Fukuyama, F. Identichnost’. Stremlenie k priznaniiu i politika nepriiatiia, transl. Moscow: Al’pina Pablisher, 2019.
Fukuyama, F. Ugasanie gosudarstvennogo poriadka, transl. Moscow: AST, 2017.
Giddens, A. Runaway World: How Globalization Is Reshaping Our Lives. New York: Routledge, 2003.
Guillen, M. 2030: How Today’s Biggest Trends Will Collide and Reshape the Future of Everything. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2020.
Haas, R. Mirovoi besporiadok, transl. Moscow: AST, 2019.
Haas, R., and Kupchan, Ch. “The New Concert of Powers. How to Prevent Catastrophe and Promote Stability in a Multipolar World, ”Foreign Affairs, March 23, 2021, URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2021-03-23/new-concertpowers
Habermas, J. Strukturnoe izmenenie publichnoi sfery: Issledovanie otnositel’no kategorii burzhuaznogo obshchestva, transl. Moscow: Ves’ mir, 2016.
Huntington, S. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Shuster, 1996.
Iakovenko, D. “ ‘Postkovidnaia era’: uskorennaia tsifrovizatsiia i novoe poniatie normy,” vc.ru, July 31, 2020, URL: https://vc.ru/services/146561-postkovidnaya-erauskorennaya-cifrovizaciya-i-novoe-ponyatie-normy
Ionin, L. G. Sotsiologiia v obshchestve znanii: ot epokhi moderna k informatsionnomu obshchestvu. Moscow: The Higher School of Economics Publishing House, 2007.
Kissinger, H. Mirovoi poriadok, transl. Moscow: AST, 2017.
Krastev, I., Holmes, S. Svet, obmanuvshii nadezhdy. Pochemu Zapad proigryvaet bor’bu za demokratiiu, transl. Moscow: Al’pina Pablisher, 2020.
Lakhani, K., and Iansiti, M. Tsifrovoe preimushchestvo: Iskusstvo konkurirovat’ v epokhu iskusstvennogo intellekta, transl. Moscow: Eksmo, 2021.
Lanier, J. Komu prinadlezhit budushchee. Mir, gde za informatsiiu budut platit’ vam, transl. Moscow: Eksmo, 2020.
Mal’kevich, A. A. “Sotsial’nye seti kak faktor politicheskoi sotsializatsii molodezhi: ot ierarkhii k setevoi modeli,” Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 12. Politicheskie nauki, No. 6, 2019, pp. 88–97.
Mamed’iarov, Z. A. “Uskorenie tsifrovizatsii na fone pandemii: mirovoi opyt i Rossiia,” Kontury global’nykh transformatsii, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2021, pp. 92–108.
Martikainen, J., and Sakki, I. “Boosting Nationalism through COVID-19 Images: Multimodal Construction of the Failure of the ‘Dear Enemy’ with COVID-19 in the National Press,” Discourse and Communication, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2021, pp. 388–414.
Muzinich, J. “America’s Crypto Conundrum. Protecting Security without Crushing Innovation,” Foreign Affairs, October 25, 2021, URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/americas-crypto-currency-conundrum
Nazarov, M. M., and Kovalev, P. A. “Pandemiia i dolgosrochnaia dinamika mediapotrebleniia, ”Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, No. 4, 2021, pp. 49–63.
Neklessa, A. I. “Tsivilizatsiia kak protsess: mul’tiplitsirovannye sub”ekty Postmoderna, ”Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, No. 5, 2021, pp. 39–55.
Nye, J. S., Jr. “How Sharp Power Threatens Soft Power. The Right and Wrong Ways to Respond to Authoritarian Influence,” Foreign Affairs, January 24, 2018, URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2018-01-24/how-sharp-power-threatenssoft-
power
Nye, J. Soft Power. The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs, 2004.
Patrick, S. M. “The International Order Isn’t Ready for the Climate Crisis. The Case for a New Planetary Politics,” Foreign Affairs, October 19, 2021, URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2021-10-19/climate-crisis-international-orderisnt-ready
Ristino, R. “The Sociocultural Model of Public Relations / Communications Management Practice: A Critical-Cultural Perspective, ”International Journal of Strategic Communications, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2008, pp. 54–73.
Rushkoff, D. Korporatsiia “Zhizn’”: Kak korporativizm zavoeval mir i kak nam poluchit’ ego obratno, transl. St. Petersburg: Kriga, 2017.
Schwab, К. Chetvertaia promyshlennaia revoliutsiia, transl. Moscow: EKSMO, 2020.
Schwab, К., and Malleret, Th. COVID-19: The Great Reset. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2020.
“Semiconductors and the U.S.-China Innovation Race: Geopolitics of the Supply Chain and the Central Role of Taiwan: A Special Report by FP Analytics,” Foreign Police, February 16, 2021, URL: https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/02/16/semiconductors-us-china-taiwan-technology-innovation-competition/
Spence, M. Sleduiushchaia konvergentsiia. Budushchee ekonomicheskogo rosta v mire, zhivushchem na raznykh skorostiakh, transl. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Press, 2013.
Srnicek, N. Kapitalizm platform, transl. Moscow: The Higher School of Economics Publishing House, 2020.
Stiglitz, J. Velikoe razdelenie. Neravenstvo v obshchestve, ili chto delat’ ostavshimsia 99 % naseleniia, transl. Moscow: Eksmo, 2016.
Urry, J. Kak vygliadit budushchee, transl. Moscow: Delo, 2018.
Yack, B. Natsionalizm i moral’naia psikhologiia obshchestva, transl. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Press, 2017.
Zakaria, F. “The End of Economics? Human Beings Are Rarely Rational — so It’s Time We All Stopped Pretending They Are,” Foreign Policy, No. 231, 2019, pp. 28–30.
Zukerberg, R. Dot Сomplicated: Untangling Our Wired Lives. New York: Harper One, 2013.