ISSN 0868-4871
En Ru
ISSN 0868-4871
The Ideological Position Of The Ruling Coalition As A Factor Of Modern Macroeconomic Policy In The OECD Countries

The Ideological Position Of The Ruling Coalition As A Factor Of Modern Macroeconomic Policy In The OECD Countries

Abstract

Partisan governments play an important role in the elaboration of macroeconomic policies of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries: they manage fiscal policy and coordinate with a Central Bank that conducts monetary policy. Ideology is a crucial parameter of the ruling coalition. This study focuses on the infl uence of the ideology of the ruling coalition on macroeconomic policies of the OECD countries. Using statistical methods, the analysis examines the relationship between the “rightism” of the ruling coalition and such characteristics of budgetary policy as budget balancing, state expenditures and tax collection. The fi ndings show that the infl uence of ideology is determined by a set of social and economic factors, so the nature of the infl uence that ideology wields may work in diff erent directions depending on the conditions.

References

Aleskerov, F. T. et al. “Poliarizovannost’ elektoral’nykh predpochtenii v Rossii (Opyt vyborov v Gosudarstvennuiu Dumu RF v 1993–2003 godakh),” Politiia, No. 2, 2004, pp. 5–26.
Alesina, A. “Macroeconomic Policy in a Two-party System as a Repeated Game, ”The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 102, No. 3, 1987, pp. 651–678.
Alesina, A., Cohen, G. D., and Roubini, N. “Macroeconomic Policy and Elections in OECD Democracies,” Economics & Politics, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1992, pp. 1–30.
Alesina, A., Roubini, N., and Cohen, G. D. Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997.
Bakker, R. et al. “Measuring Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999–2010,” Party Politics, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2015, pp. 143–152.
Beck, N., and Katz, J. N. “What to Do (and not to Do) with Time-series Crosssection Data, ”American Political Science Review, Vol. 89, No. 3, 1995, pp. 634–647.
Blais, A., Blake, D., and Dion, S. “Do Parties Make a Diff erence? Parties and the Size of Government in Liberal Democracies,” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 37, No. 1, 1993, pp. 40–62.
Bräuninger, T. “A Partisan Model of Government Expenditure,” Public Choice, Vol. 125, No. 3–4, 2005, pp. 409–429.
Cameron, D. R. “The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis, ”American Political Science Review, Vol. 72, No. 4, 1978, pp. 1243–1261.
Cowart, A. T. “The Economic Policies of European Governments, Part II: Fiscal Policy, ”British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1978, pp. 425–439.
Cusack, T. R. “Partisan Politics and Fiscal Policy,” Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1999, pp. 464–486.
Dalton, R. J., Farrell, D. M., and McAllister, I. Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
De Haan, J., and Sturm, J. E. “Political and Economic Determinants of OECD Budget Deficits and Government Expenditures: A Reinvestigation,” European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1997, pp. 739–750.
Döring, H., and Manow, P. Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies. Development version. 2016. URL: http://www.parlgov.org/data/table/view_cabinet/
Drazen, A. “The Political Business Cycle after 25 Years,” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, Vol. 15, eds. B. S. Bernanke, and K. Rogoff . Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001, pp. 75–138.
Everaert, G., and Pozzi, L. “Bootstrap-based Bias Correction for Dynamic Panels, ”Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2007, pp. 1160–1184.
Hahm, S. D., Kamlet, M. S., and Mowery, D. С. “Infl uences on Defi cit Spending in Industrialized Democracies,” Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1995, pp. 183–197.
Herwartz, H., and Theilen, B. “Ideology and Redistribution through Public Spending, ”European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 46, 2017, pp. 74–90.
Hibbs, D. A. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, 1977, pp. 1467–1487.
Hicks, A. M., and Swank, D. H. “Politics, Institutions, and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, 1960–82, ”American Political Science Review, Vol. 86, No. 3, 1992, pp. 658–674.
Imbeau, L. M., Pétry, F., and Lamari, M. “Left-right Party Ideology and Government Policies: A Meta-analysis,” European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2001, pp. 1–29.
Nordhaus, W. D. “The Political Business Cycle,” The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 42, No. 2, 1975, pp. 169–190.
Potrafke, N. “Did Globalization Restrict Partisan Politics? An Empirical Evaluation of Social Expenditures in a Panel of OECD Countries, ”Public Choice, Vol. 140, No. 1–2, 2009, pp. 105–124.
Potrafke, N. “Political Cycles and Economic Performance in OECD Countries: Empirical Evidence from 1951–2006,” Public Choice, Vol. 150, No. 1–2, 2012, pp. 155–179.
Sakamoto, T. Economic Policy and Performance in Industrial Democracies: Party Governments, Central Banks and the Fiscal-Monetary Policy Mix. New York: Routledge, 2008.
Swank, D. H. “The Political Economy of Government Domestic Expenditure in the Affl uent Democracies, 1960–80,” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1988, pp. 1120–1150.
Volkens, A. et al. The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2016b. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, 2016. URL: https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/datasets/MPDS2016b
PDF, ru

Keywords: fiscal policy; partisan government; democracies; ideology; political economy

Available in the on-line version with: 15.10.2017

To cite this article
Number 5, 2017