Step Forward: The Problem Of Worldview In Modern Russia

This paper is a conceptual development of the study of worldview as a term and a social phenomenon. The work refers to the existing concepts of ‘worldview’ and its structure, reveals the actual features of the public and expert perception of related categories (‘ideology’, ‘myth’, ‘utopia’), and also suggests directions for the development of the existing academic discourse related to research in an extremely important problem field. The structure of the worldview is described through the pentabasis model, which makes it possible to build value connections between the elements of the worldview (‘person’, ‘ family’, ‘society’, ‘state’, ‘country’) and identify the principles that correspond to these value connections. The final part of the article describes the institutional framework of the pentabasis, which consists of a system of symbols, ideas, rules, practices and rituals. This approach outlines a possible direction for the development of the existing academic discourse and will allow further verification of fundamental hypotheses related to the key worldview guidelines of Russian society, its value matrix and the possible institutional framework of the latter. The pentabasis model can be in demand to formulate a proposals focused on applied public governance decisions.

References

Aerts, D., Apostel, L., De Moor, B., Hellemans, S., Maex, E., Van Belle, H., and Van der Veken, J. Worldviews: From Fragmentation to Integration. Brussels: VUB Press, 1994.
Althusser, L. “Ideologiia i ideologicheskie apparaty gosudarstva,” Neprikosnovennyi zapas, No. 3, 2010, pp. 159–175.
Barkan, S. Social Problems: Continuity and Change. Washington: Saylor Foundation, 2016.
Barkan, S. Sociology: Understanding and Changing the Social World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing, 2016.
Bellah, R. N. “Civil Religion in America, ”Daedalus, Vol. 96, No. 1, 1967, pp. 1–21.
Dolan, S., Garcia, S., and Richley, B. Managing by Values: A Guide to Living, Being Alive, and Making a Living in the 21st Century. London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2006.
Eagleton, T. Ideology: An Introduction. London: Verso, 1991.
Freeden, M. “The Morphological Analysis of Ideology,” The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies, eds. M. Freeden, L. T. Sargent, and M. Stears. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 115–137.
Freeden, M. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
Freeden, M., Sargent, L. T., and Stears M. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Fromm, E. Begstvo ot svobody. Moscow: AST, 2016.
Funk, K. “What Is a Worldview?” Oregon State University, March 21, 2001, URL: http://web.engr.oregonstate.edu/~funkk/Personal/worldview.html
Geertz, C. Interpretatsiia kul’tur. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2004.
Habermas, J. Tekhnika i nauka kak ‘ideologiia’. Moscow: Praksis, 2007.
Hodge, B. “Ideology, Identity, Interaction: Contradictions and Challenges for Critical Discourse Analysis,” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2012, pp. 1–18.
Kharichev, A. D., Shutov, A. Iu., Polosin, A. V., and Sokolova, E. N. “Vospriiatie bazovykh tsennostei, faktorov i struktur sotsial’no-istoricheskogo razvitiia Rossii (po materialam issledovanii i aprobatsii),” Zhurnal politicheskikh issledovanii, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2022, pp. 9–19.
Korovka, P. A. “Psikhosemanticheskaia struktura mirovozzreniia sovremennogo studenta,” Izvestiia Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni A.I. Gertsena, No. 112, 2009, pp. 269–275.
Krzakiewicz, K. “Management by Values — a Strategic Dimension,” Management, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2012, pp. 7–15.
Linz, J., and Stepan, A. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-communist Europe. Baltimore: JHU Press, 1996.
Mannheim, K. “Ideologiia i utopiia,” Mannheim, K. Diagnoz nashego vremeni. Moscow: Iurist, 1994, pp. 7–277.
Mel’vil’, A. Iu. “Vyiti iz ‘getto’: o vklade postsovetskikh issledovanii / Russian Studies v sovremennuiu politicheskuiu nauku,” Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, No. 1, 2020, pp. 22–43.
Merkel, W., and Croissant, A. “Formal Institutions and Informal Rules in Defective Democracies,” Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Bd. 41, Nr. 1, 2000, pp. 3–30.
Telin, K. O., and Filimonov, K. G. “Probely identichnosti: kak i pochemu natsiia uskol’zaet ot gosudarstva,” Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2020, pp. 35–73.
Vostrikov, I. V., and Sulimov, S. I. “Struktura mirovozzreniia,” Vestnik Viatskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta, No. 4, 2010, pp. 14–20.
Walzer, M. O terpimosti. Moscow: Ideia-press, 2000.