Russia’s 2020 New Constitutional Amendments: Where Is the Iceberg of Sovereignty Drifting?

Abstract

The article offers an analysis of the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation implemented in 2020. The author comes to the conclusion that due to the shortcomings of the 1993 Constitution — adopted in the context of a political crisis — its revision was unavoidable. In the new socio-political realities of the 2010s–2020s, the Russian authorities decided, for the first time, to establish a channel of communication with the society, which forced them to rely on the procedure of popular vote on the amendments and support of the notion of “unconditional sovereignty” as a goal of the constitutional changes. Having received this popular approval, the political regime of Vladimir Putin, representing a compromise between transnational and national elites, announced a new stage of state-building. The main task of this process is indeed the gradual repudiation of the external influence that developed in the 1990s. Consequently, the value of sovereignty and its various types becomes the main reference point of the Russian state policy. Will the opportunity become a reality? The answer to this question largely depends on the future socio-economic track undertaken by the Russian authorities.

References

1. Abaeva, E. A. “K voprosu o legitimnosti sovremennoi konstitutsionnoi reform,” Izvestiia Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaia seriia. Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2020, pp. 449–458.
2. Albert, R. Constitutional Amendments: Making, Breaking, and Changing Constitutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
3. Avak'ian, S. A. Konstitutsiia Rossii: priroda, evoliutsiia, sovremennost'. Moscow: RIuID, 1997.
4. Bachilo, I. L. “Gosudarstvo sotsial'noe ili servisnoe? (informatsionno-pravovoi aspekt),” Pravo: Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, No. 1, 2010, pp. 3–11.
5. Bagdasarian, V. E., Mikheenkov, V. P., and Sviridenko, V. P. “Riski i ugrozy servisizatsii Rossii v ramkakh ideologemy postindustrializma,” Servis v Rossii i za rubezhom, No. 5, 2012, pp. 30–42.
6. Bernal, С. “On Constitutional Dismemberment,” Yale Journal of International Law, 2018, URL: https://www.yjil.yale.edu/on-constitutional-dismemberment/
7. Bjorn, E. R., and Roger, D. C. “Amendment Procedures and Constitutional Stability,” Democratic Constitutional Design and Public Policy: Analysis and Evidence, eds. R. D. Congleton, and B. Swedenborg. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2006, pp. 536–561.
8. Bondar', N. S. “Konstitutsionnye tsennosti — kategoriia deistvuiushchego prava (v kontekste praktiki Konstitutsionnogo suda Rossii),” Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiia, No. 6, 2009, pp. 1–11.
9. Contiades, X. (ed.) Engineering Constitutional Change: A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA. Abington: Routledge, 2012.
10. Criado de Diego, M. “Sobre el concepto de representación política: lineamientos para un estudio de las transformaciones de la democracia representative,” Revista Derecho del Estado, No. 28, 2012, pp. 77–114.
11. Ebzeev, B. S. Chelovek, narod, gosudarstvo v konstitutsionnom stroe Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Moscow: Prospekt, 2015.
12. Fedulin, A. A., and Bagdasarian, D. E. Servis v istoricheskom i filosofskom osmyslenii. Moscow: Sobranie, 2010.
13. Gargarella, R. “Rev.: Constitutional Amendments: Making, Breaking, and Changing Constitutions, by Richard Albert,” Revista Derecho del Estado, No. 48, 2021, pp. 371–389.
14. Gargarella, R. Latin American Constitutionalism, 1810–2010: The Engine Room of the Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
15. Grachev, N. I. “Edinstvo gosudarstvennoi vlasti kak osnovopolagaiushchii politiko-pravovoi printsip gosudarstvennogo stroitel'stva: istoriia i sovremennost',” Legal Concept, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2016, pp. 19–26.
16. Gritsenko, E. “Federalizm i mestnoe samoupravlenie v svete rossiiskoi konstitutsionnoi reformy 2020 goda,” Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, No. 4, 2020, pp. 80–97.
17. Huq, A., and Ginsburg, T. How to Save a Constitutional Democracy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2018.
18. Khabrieva, T. Ia. “Paradigmy konstitutsionnoi reform,” Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniia, No. 5, 2015, pp. 821–830.
19. Khabrieva, T. Ia. “Reformirovanie Konstitutsii Rossiiskoi Federatsii: vozmozhnost' i neobkhodimost',” Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava, No. 11, 2003, pp. 20–32.
20. Khabrieva, T. Ia. (ed.) Venetsianskaia komissiia o konstitutsiiakh, konstitutsionnykh popravkakh i konstitutsionnom pravosudii: Sbornik analiticheskikh materialov Venetsianskoi komissii Soveta Evropy. Moscow: Institut zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniia pri Pravitel'stve Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2016.
21. Khabrieva, T. Ia. Konstitutsionnaia reforma v sovremennom mire. Moscow: Nauka, 2016.
22. Khabrieva, T. Ia., and Chirkin, V. E. Teoriia sovremennoi konstitutsii. Moscow: Norma, 2005.
23. Komarova, V. V. “Konstitutsionnaia reforma 2020 g. v Rossii (nekotorye aspekty),” Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava, Vol. 15, No. 8, 2020, pp. 22–31.
24. Kondrashev, A. A. “Konstitutsionnye tsennosti v sovremennom rossiiskom gosudarstve: o konfliktakh i deval'vatsiiakh,” Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe parvo, No. 1, 2017, pp. 6–13.
25. Kravets, I. A. “ ‘Gospodstvo prava’ i ‘blagoe upravlenie’ kak konstitutsionnye tsennosti v publichnoi sfere i gosudarstvennom upravlenii,” Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe parvo, No. 12, 2019, pp. 38–58.
26. Kyvig, D. E. “Arranging for Amendment: Unintended Outcomes of Constitutional Design,” Unintended Consequences of Constitutional Amendment, ed. D.E. Kyvig. Athens; London: University of Georgia Press, 2000, pp. 9–42.
27. Levitski, S., and Ziblatt, D. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown, 2018.
28. Luk'ianova, E. A. “Nekotorye problemy Konstitutsii Rossiiskoi Federatsii,” Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe parvo, No. 15, 2007, pp. 4–10.
29. Marshall Barberan, P. “Sufragio por Internet: análisis teórico y comparado,” Cuestiones Constitucionales: Revista Mexicana de Derecho Constitucional, No. 39, 2018, pp. 579–604.
30. Mastikova, N. S. “Vospriiatie sotsial'noi spravedlivosti rossiianami na osnove dannykh evropeiskogo issledovaniia,” Nauchnyi rezul'tat. Sotsiologiia i upravlenie, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2019, pp. 39–51.
31. Mavrin, S. P. “Konstitutsionnye tsennosti i ikh rol' v rossiiskoi pravovoi sisteme,” Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiia, No. 3, 2012, pp. 1–13.
32. Medushevskii, A. N. “Konstitutsionnye popravki v Rossii 2020 kak politicheskii proekt pereustroistva gosudarstva,” Publichnaia politika, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2020, pp. 43–66.
33. Melville, A. Y. “A Neoconservative Consensus in Russia? Main Components, Factors of Stability, Potential of Erosion,” Russian Social Science Review, Vol. 61, No. 3–4, 2020, pp. 220–235.
34. Mendeleev, D. I. Problemy ekonomicheskogo razvitiia Rossii. Moscow: Sotsekgiz, 1960.
35. Mora Carvajal, D. “El constitucionalismo global: ¿oportunidad para un derecho internacional más unitario y coherente?” Revista Derecho del Estado, No. 45, 2020, pp. 101–119.
36. Mounk, Y. The People vs Democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2018.
37. Oseichuk, V. I. “O neobkhodimosti novogo etapa konstitutsionnoi reformy v Rossii,” Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe parvo, No. 5, 2006, pp. 6–11.
38. Ponkin, I. V. “O poniatii i kontsepte ‘khoroshego upravleniia’ (‘good governance’),” Gosudarstvennaia sluzhba, No. 4, 2013, pp. 39–42.
39. Przeworski, A. Crises of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
40. Putilo, N. V. “Iuridicheskie kriterii sotsial'nogo gosudarstva: novye podkhody,” Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava, No. 10, 2016, pp. 15–25.
41. Ramelli, A. “Luces y sombras del ejercicio del test de sustitución en Colombia,” Revista Derecho del Estado, No. 48, 2021, pp. 31–50.
42. Stepanchenko, V. I. “O predposylkakh razrabotki Konstitutsii Rossiiskoi Federatsii 1993 goda i izmeneniiakh v normakh konstitutsii SSSR i RSFSR v 90-e gody proshlogo veka,” Iuridicheskaia nauka, No. 3, 2013, pp. 58–65.
43. Tatarinov, S. A. “Rol' Konstitutsionnogo suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii v ukreplenii i razvitii konstitutsionnykh tsennostei,” Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, No. 432, 2018, pp. 224–230.
44. Teplova, D. O. “Konstitutsionnaia reforma 2020: nekotorye aspekty,” Obrazovanie i parvo, No. 6, 2020, pp. 65–72.
45. Tsarapkina, O. A. “Odnopolye braki. Argumenty za i protiv,” Nauka. Obshchestvo. Gosudarstvo, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2019, pp. 23–29.
46. Urueña, R. No Citizens Here: Global Subjects and Participation in International Law. Leiden; Boston: Brill; Martinus Nijhoff, 2012.
47. Velieva, D. S. “Problemy konstitutsionnoi kontseptualizatsii poniatiia ‘dostoinaia zhizn'’,” Leningradskii iuridicheskii zhurnal, No. 2, 2014, pp. 74–84.
48. Verin-Galitskii, D. V. “O tsennostiakh vospitaniia,” Sotsial'naia pedagogika, No. 2, 2013, pp. 99–104.
49. Vitruk, N. V. “Konstitutsiia Rossiiskoi Federatsii kak tsennost' i konstitutsionnye tsennosti: voprosy teorii i praktiki,” Vitruk, N. V. Pravo, demokratiia i lichnost' v konstitutsionnom izmerenii: (istoriia, doktrina i praktika): Izbrannye trudy (1991–2012 gg.). Moscow: Norma, 2012, pp. 165–175.
50. Zor'kin, V. D. “Bukva i dukh Konstitutsii,” Rossiiskaia gazeta, October 10, 2018, No. 226 (7689).
51. Zor'kin, V. D. Konstitutsionnyi sud Rossii. Doktrina i praktika. Moscow: Norma, 2019.
52. Zor'kin, V. D. Pravo v usloviiakh global'nykh peremen. Moscow: Norma, 2013.
53. Zorkin, V. Axiological Aspects of the Russian Constitution. Den Haag: Eleven International Publishing, 2010.