Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to the Analysis of War Memory in Modern Memory Studies

Abstract

The article analyses the use of video games with a historical plot to develop or erode the ingroup favoritism of the Russian population and its national and state identity. The methodology of the work is based on a combination of elements of comparative and structural analysis with the analysis of the secondary sociological research literature. Collecting and analysing data from recent opinion polls, the author proves that in the current situation the image of the present, the future and “significant others” do not represent the source of the development of ingroup favoritism among Russian youth, a fact that in the long run threatens the stability of identity of citizens of the Russian Federation. Although the results of the opinion polls indicate the possibility of exploiting the image of the past in order to develop ingroup favoritism, the younger generation demonstrates a rejection of traditional forms of narratives of memories. Accordingly, video games seem to be the most promising resource for constructing the image of the past. However, from a commercial point of view, the implementation of these projects is fraught with high risks, indicating the need for state intervention and support. The article suggests that in intervening in this sector the state should take into account the shortcomings identified in the system of state sponsorship of commercial filmmaking industry, as one of the closest sectors capable of forming a positive national-state identity.

References

1. Achugar, M. What We Remember: The Construction of Memory in Military Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2008. 
2. Alexander, J. “Kul'turnaia travma i kollektivnaia identichnost',” Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal, No. 3, 2012, pp. 6–40. 
3. Anderson, B. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1983. 
4. Anikin, D. A. “Pamiat' o Velikoi Otechestvennoi voine kak simvolicheskii resurs: osobennosti funktsionirovaniia v religioznom soobshchestve,” Studia Humanitatis, No. 1, 2020, URL: http://st-hum.ru/content/anikin-da-pamyat-o-velikoy-otechestvennoy-voyne-kak-simvolicheskiy-resurs-o... 
5. Anikin, D. A., and Iarovaia, I. A. “Politika pamiati o Vtoroi mirovoi voine v sovremennoi Frantsii: etnopoliticheskie faktory i partiinye konfrontatsii,” Vlast', Vol. 28, No. 4, 2020, pp. 131–137. 
6. Ashplant, T. G. “War Commemoration in Western Europe: Changing Meanings, Divisive Loyalties, Unheard Voices,” The Politics of War Memory and Commemoration, eds. T. G. Ashplant, G. Dawson, and M. Roper. London; New York: Routledge, 2000, pp. 263–273. 
7. Ashplant, T. G., Dawson, G., and Roper, M. “Framing the Issues. The Politics of War Memory and Commemoration: Contexts, Structures and Dynamics,” The Politics of War Memory and Commemoration, eds. T. G. Ashplant, G. Dawson, and M. Roper. London; New York: Routledge, 2000, pp. 1–87.  
8. Batishchev, R. Iu., Beliaev, E. V., and Linchenko, A. A. “Russkaia Pravoslavnaia Tserkov' kak aktor sovremennoi politiki pamiati: diskurs kanonizatsii,” Studia Humanitatis, No. 1, 2018, URL: http://st-hum.ru/content/batishchev-ryu-belyaev-ev-linchenko-aa-russkaya-pravoslavnaya-cerkov-kak-ak... 
9. Bell, D. “Introduction: Memory, Trauma and World Politics,” Memory, Trauma and World Politics: Reflections on the Relationships between Past and Present, ed. D. Bell. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 2006, pp. 1–33. 
10. Caruth, C. Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative and History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996. 
11. Courteaux, O. “General de Gaulle and the Second World War: Constructing a French Narrative,” Between Memory and Mythology: The Construction of Memory of Modern Wars, ed. N. Starostina. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2015, pp. 3–23.
12. Danilova, N. The Politics of War Commemoration in the UK and Russia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. 
13. Edwards, S. “Commemoration and Consumption in Normandy, 1945–1994,” War Memory and Popular Culture: Essays on Modes of Remembrance and Commemoration, eds. M. Keren, and H. H. Herwig. Jefferson; London: McFarlnad, 2009, pp. 76–92. 
14. Edwards, S. Allies in Memory. World War II and the Politics of Transatlantic Commemoration, c. 1941–2001. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. 
15. Eyerman, R. “Kul'turnaia travma i kollektivnaia pamiat',” Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, No. 5, 2016, pp. 42–54. 
16. Friedlander, S. “Trauma, Transference and ‘Working Through’ in Writing the History of the Shoah,” History and Memory, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1992, pp. 39–59. 
17. Hobsbawn, E. “Introduction: Inventing Traditions,” The Invention of Tradition, eds. E. Hobsbawm, and T. Ranger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983, pp. 1–15. 
18. Hutton, P. H. “Preface. Pioneering Scholarship on the Uses of Mythology in the Remembrance of Modern Wars,” Between Memory and Mythology: The Construction of Memory of Modern Wars, ed. N. Starostina. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2015, pp. 11–27. 
19. Keren, M. “Introduction,” War Memory and Popular Culture: Essays on Modes of Remembrance and Commemoration, eds. M. Keren, and H. H. Herwig. Jefferson; London: McFarlnad, 2009, pp. 1–9. 
20. Linchenko, A., and Anikin, D. “The Political Uses of the Past in Modern Russia: The Images of the October Revolution 1917 in the Politics of Memory of Russian Parties,” European Politics and Society, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2020, pp. 356–370. 
21. Malinova, O. Iu. “Kommemoratsiia istoricheskikh sobytii kak instrument simvolicheskoi politiki: vozmozhnosti sravnitel'nogo analiza,” Politiia. Analiz. Khronika. Prognoz, No. 4, 2017, pp. 6–22. 
22. March, L. “Going to War in Korea and Vietnam: The Decisions of Harry Truman and Lyndon Johnson,” Between Memory and Mythology: The Construction of Memory of Modern Wars, ed. N. Starostina. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2015, pp. 53–63. 
23. Moss, G. L. Fallen Soldiers: Reshaping the Memory of the World Wars. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1990. 
24. Nora, P. “Problematika mest pamiati,” Nora, P., Ozouf, M., de Puymège, G., and Winock, M. Frantsiia-pamiat'. St. Petesburg: St. Petersburg Universitity Press, 1999, pp. 17–50. 
25. Peace, R. “Contested Narratives in the United States over the Contra War (Nicaragua, 1980s),” Between Memory and Mythology: The Construction of Memory of Modern Wars, ed. N. Starostina. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2015, pp. 63–85. 
26. “Popular Memory: Theory, Politics, Method / Popular Memory Group, Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham,” Making Histories: Studies in History-Writing and Politic, eds. R. Johnson, G. McLennan, B. Schwarz, and D. Sutton. London: Hutchinson, 1982, pp. 205–252. 
27. Renan, E. “Chto takoe natsiia?” Renan, E. Sobranie sochinenii: In 12 vols., transl., ed. V.N. Mikhailovskii, Vol. 6. Kiev: Izd. B. Fuksa, 1902, pp. 87–101. 
28. Scates, B. C. “Manufacturing Memory at Gallipoli,” War Memory and Popular Culture: Essays on Modes of Remembrance and Commemoration, eds. M. Keren, and H. H. Herwig. Jefferson; London: McFarlnad, 2009, pp. 57–76. 
29. Smelser, N. J. Theory of Collective Behavior. New York: The Free Press, 1963. 
30. Starostina, N. “Introduction,” Between Memory and Mythology: The Construction of Memory of Modern Wars, ed. N. Starostina. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2015, pp. 27–42. 
31. Sztompka, P. The Sociology of Social Change. Oxford; Cambridge: Blackwell, 1993. 
32. Thompson, A. Anzac Memories: Living with the Legend. Melbourne: Monash University Publishing, 1994. 
33. Winter, J. “Notes on the Memory Boom: War, Remembrance and the Uses of the Past,” Memory, Trauma and World Politics: Reflections on the Relationships between Past and Present, ed. D. Bell. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 2006, pp. 54–74.