Political Mentalization of the French Ruling Elites: A Political-psychological Essay

The subject of the essay is the main stages of the historical past of French civilization, in the depths of which the political mentality of the ruling elites was formed. In the beginning, the authors consider the mental and civilizational results of the five hundred years of Romanization of Gaul as a province of the Roman Empire. The role of Christian proselytism in the formation of the monotheistic mentality and the political role of the Church of Gaul are revealed. The thesis about the mental heritage of the Roman Empire in the conditions of its collapse and the formation of the foundations of an original Christian nation is revealed. Then there is the convergence of the Roman and barbarian social structures of the Frankish Empire, as a result of which a monotheistic mental space was formed and Catholicism became the state religion. The conclusion is made about the historical and mental-political significance of chivalry. In the next section, the authors turned to the philosophical, theological and scientific heritage of the enlighteners of the Middle Ages and the New Age, who influenced the development of the political mentality of the French elites. The separate part of the essay examines the influence of the French Renaissance on the ruling elites, who, having mastered the mental models of the Italian Renaissance, began to build their national identity on their basis. The centuries-old theological and political nature of French political power in the Renaissance was transformed into a subject-pragmatic one. For the first time in the political history of Europe, politics was separated from religion. Christian dogmas as the basic mental attitudes of the elites gave way to the semantic primacy of secular principles of existence. During the period of absolutism, on the soil cultivated by the Renaissance, anti-absolutist and anti-clerical mental and political attitudes were formed in the elite environment, which determined the nature of the revolutionary events of the 18th-19th centuries. During the period of the Consulate and the First Empire, Napoleon I, seeking to ensure the economic dominance of the Empire and its military superiority over the countries of the continent, pursued a policy of mental reconstruction of the elite in order to create a new nobility. In the course of the analysis, the authors reveal the dialectical nature of the mental dynamics of the French elites.

References

Achkinazi, B. A. “Sotsial’naia politika Natsional’nogo bloka (1919–1920 gody),” Frantsuzskii ezhegodnik, 1981. Moscow: Nauka, 1983, pp. 91–105.
Akimova, E. Iu. Osnovnye cherty sotsial’no-politicheskogo samosoznaniia rytsarstva: (po sochineniiam Le Belia i Fruassara): Thesis. Saratov, 2008.
Anceau, E. Napoléon III. Paris: Tallandier, 2012.
Anisimov, O. V. “Provozglashenie i priznanie imperii Napoleona III,” Trudy Kafedry istorii Novogo i Noveishego vremeni Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, No. 3, 2009, pp. 151–160.
Anthony, J. R. Musique en France à l’époque baroque. Paris: Flammarion, 1981.
Auphan, E., and Brücher, W. “La France: du centralisme vers la décentralisation?” DeuFraMat, URL: http://www.deuframat.de/fr/regions/structure-politique-centralismedecentralisation/
la-france-du-centralisme-vers-la-decentralisation/le-centralismecomme-principe-fondateur-de-lorganisation-de-letat.html
Basovskaia, N. I. Stoletniaia voina, 1337–1453. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola, 1985.
Bertaud, J.-P. “Napoleon’s Officers,” Past and Present, Vol. 112, No. 3, 1986, pp. 91–111.
Biard, M., and Leuwers, H. “Visages de la Terreur,” Visages de la Terreur: L’exception politique de l’an II, eds. M. Biard, and H. Leuwers. Paris: Armand Colin, 2014, pp. 5–14.
Brizay, F. “Fondamentalisme et intolérance: le regard d’historiens des guerres de Religion sur le djihadisme contemporain,” Annales de Bretagne et des pays de l’Ouest, Vol. 125, No. 1, 2018, pp. 137–150.
Brunaux, J.-L. Gally. Moscow: Veche, 2011.
Cardini, F. Istoki srednevekovogo rytsarstva, eds. V. I. Ukolova, and L. A. Kotel’-nikova. Moscow: Progress, 1987.
Cherkasov, P. P. Sud’ba imperii. Ocherki kolonial’noi ekspansii Frantsii v 16–20 vekakh. Moscow: Nauka, 1983.
Chistiakov, A. N. “ ‘Mysli’ Paskalia i zhanr apologii,” Izvestiia RGPU im. A.I. Gertsena: Aspirantskie tetradi, No. 39, 2008, pp. 189–194.
Cohen, G. Istoriia rytsarstva vo Frantsii. Etiket, turniry, poedinki. Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf, 2019.
Collier, R. B., and Collier, D. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.
Copleston, F. C. Akvinat: Vvedenie v filosofiiu velikogo srednevekovogo myslitelia. Dolgoprudnyi: Vestkom. 1999.
Delaplace, C., and France, J. Histoire des Gaules (VIe s. av. J.-C. — VIe s. ap. J.-C.). 5e ed. Paris: Armand Colin, 2016.
Descartes, R. Sochineniia: In 2 vols., ed. V. V. Sokolova, Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl’, 1994.
Dijn, A. French Political Thought from Montesquieu to Tocqueville: Liberty in a Levelled Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Drinkwater, J. F. “The Bacaudae of Fifth-century Gaul,” Fifth-century Gaul. A Crisis of Identity? eds. J. F. Drinkwater, and H. Elton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 208–217.
Egorova-Gantman, E., and Egorova, E. Unizhenie i mest’ v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniiakh. Politiko-psikhologicheskii analiz. Moscow: Grifon, 2022.
Englund, S. Napoleon: A Political Life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.
Favier, J. François Villon. Paris: Fayard, 1982. Ferry, L. “Les Français sont-ils encore cartésiens?” Le Point, 3 juin, 1995, pp. 56–57.
Fischer, K. Dekart: Ego zhizn’, sochineniia i ucheniia. St. Petersburg: Mifril, 1994.
Flori, J. Povsednevnaia zhizn’ rytsarei v Srednie veka, transl. F. F. Nesterov. Moscow: Molodaia gvardiia, 2006.
Garrisson, J. L’Édit de Nantes: chronique d’une paix attendue. Paris: Fayard, 1998.
Gilson, É. Izbrannoe, Vol. 1: Tomizm: Vvedenie v filosofiiu sv. Fomy Akvinskogo. St. Petersburg: Universitetskaia kniga, 2001.
Gooch, G. P. The Second Empire. London: Longmans, 1960.
Goudineau, Ch. Le Dossier Vercingétorix. Paris: Actes Sud, 2009.
Graceffa, A. “Antiquité barbare, l’autre Antiquité: l’impossible réception des historiens français (1800–1950),” Anabases, No. 8, 2008, pp. 83–104.
Gurvich, S. N. “Byl li Klemanso chlenom partii radikalov?” Frantsuzskii ezhegodnik, 1980. Moscow: Nauka, 1982, pp. 142–153.
Henshall, N. The Myth of Absolutism: Change and Continuity in Early Modern European Monarchy. London: Routledge, 1992.
Hugo, V. Histoire d’un crime. Paris: La Fabrique, 2009.
Huizinga, J. Homo ludens. V teni zavtrashnego dnia. Moscow: Progress: Progress-Akademiia, 1992.
Huizinga, J. Osen’ Srednevekov’ia: Issledovanie form zhiznennogo uklada i form myshleniia v 14 i 15 vekakh vo Frantsii i Niderlandakh, transl. D. V. Sil’vestrova. Moscow: Progress-kul’tura, 1995.
Iur’ev, A. I. “Predislovie,” Rakitianskii, N. M. Mental’nye issledovaniia global’nykh politicheskikh mirov. Moskva: Moscow University Press, 2020, pp. 9–25.
Joutard, Ph. La révocation de l’édit de Nantes ou les faiblesses d’un État. Paris: Gallimard, 2018.
Kareev, N. I. Zapadnoevropeiskaia absoliutnaia monarkhiia 16, 17 i 18 vekov: Obshchaia kharakteristika biurokraticheskogo gosudarstva i soslovnogo obshchestva ‘starogo poriadka’. Moscow: GPIB Rossii, 2009.
Kireevskii, I. V. Dukhovnye osnovy russkoi zhizni. Moscow: Institut Russkoi Tsivilizatsii, 2007.
Komte, O. Obshchii obzor pozitivizma, ed. E. L. Radlova. 3rd ed. Moscow: Knizhnyi dom ‘Librokom’, 2012.
Le Bon, G. Psikhologiia narodov i mass. Moscow: AST, 2022.
Le Goff, J. Intellektualy v Srednie veka, transl. A. M. Rutkevich. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press, 2003.
Le Goff, J. Tsivilizatsiia srednevekovogo Zapada, ed. V. A. Babintsev. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriia, 2005.
Lebecq, S. Proiskhozhdenie frankov. V–IX veka, Vol. 1. Moscow: Skarabei, 1993.
Lebedev, A. P. Vopros o proiskhozhdenii arianstva. Moscow: Kniga po trebovaniiu, 2021.
Lega, V. P. Istoriia zapadnoi filosofii, Vol. 2. Novoe vremia. Sovremennaia zapadnaia filosofiia. 2nd ed. Moscow: PSTGU, 2009.
Lentz, T. Napoleon: ‘Moia tsel’ byla velikoi’. Moscow: Astrel’: AST, 2003.
Lloyd George, D. Pravda o mirnykh dogovorakh, Vol. 1. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo inostrannoi literatury, 1957.
Losev, A. F. Dialektika mifa. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt, 2008.
Malinin, Iu. P. “Rytsarskaia etika v pozdnesrednevekovoi Frantsii (XIV–XV veka),” Srednie veka, Vol. 55. Moscow: Nauka, 1992, pp. 195–213.
Malinin, Iu. P. Obshchestvenno-politicheskaia mysl’ pozdnesrednevekovoi Frantsii XIV–XV vekov. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press, 2000.
Martin, J.-C. Contre-Révolution, Révolution et Nation en France, 1789–1799. Paris: Seuil, 1998.
Marx, K. “Vosemnadtsatoe briumera Lui Bonapata,” Marx, K., Engels, F. Sochineniia, Vol. 8. i2nd ed. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1957, pp. 115–217.
Maurois, A. Istoriia Frantsii. Moscow: Azbuka-Attikus, 2006.
Meisner, J. Wider die Entsinnlichund des Glaudes: Gedanken zur Re-Evangelisierung Europas. Graz; Wien; Köln: Styria, 1990.
Merezhkovskii, D. C. Reformatory. Liuter, Kal’vin, Paskal. Brussels; Paris: Zhizn’ s Bogom: La Presse Libre, 1990.
Mérimée, P. Khronika tsarstvovaniia Karla IX. Novelly, transl. A. Mikhailov. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia literatura, 1975.
Mikhailov, A. D. Frantsuzskii rytsarskii roman i voprosy tipologii zhanra v srednevekovoi literature. Moscow: Nauka, 1976.
Mikhailov, A. D. Ot Fransua Viiona do Marselia Prusta: Stranitsy istorii frantsuzskoi literatury Novogo vremeni (XVI–XIX veka), Vol. 1. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskikh kul’tur, 2009.
Montaigne, M. Opyty: In 3 vols., eds. A. S. Bobovich, F. A. Kogan-Bernshtein, N. Ia. Rykova, and A. A. Smirnov, Vols. 1–2. Moscow: Nauka, 1979.
Morçay, R. La Renaissance, Vol. I. Paris: J. de Gigord, 1933.
Narochnitskaia, E. A. “Politicheskaia filosofiia Sharlia de Gollia — Vzgliad iz 21 veka. Mezhdunarodnoe izmerenie,” Sovremennaia Evropa, No. 7, 2020, pp. 188–198.
Narochnitskaia, E. A. Vneshnepoliticheskoe nasledie gollizma v sovremennoi Frantsii. Frantsiia na poroge peremen: ekonomika i politika v nachale 21 veka. Moscow: IMEMO RAN, 2016.
Nekhorosheva, K. I. “Dekart i kartezianstvo kak chast’ kul’tury Frantsii,” Vestnik VGU. Seriia: Filosofiia, No. 4, 2017, pp. 141–146.
Neretina, S. S. Slovo i tekst v srednevekovoi kul’ture. Kontseptualizm Abeliara. Moscow: Gnozis, 1995.
Nonte, S. [Nechaev, S. Iu.] Frantsiia: Polnaia istoriia strany. Moscow: AST, 2022.
Parnakh, V. (ed.) Ispanskie i portugal’skie poety, zhertvy inkvizitsii: stikhotvoreniia, stseny iz komedii, khroniki, opisaniia autodafe, protokoly, obvinitel’nye akty, prigovory. Leningrad: Academia, 1934.
Pascal, В. Pensées. Léon: Brunschvicg, 2015. Petrus Abaelardus. Dialogus inter Philosophum, Iudaeum, et Christianum, ed. F. H. Rheinwald. Berolini: Chr. Fr. Enslin, 1831.
Radica, G. “De Montesquieu à Rousseau: les Anglais sont-ils libres?” Revue Française d’Histoire des Idées Politiques, No. 1, 2012, pp. 147–157.
Rakitianskii, N. M. “Opyt sistematicheskogo izlozheniia metodologii mental’nykh issledovanii,” Izvestiia Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia ‘Politologiia. Religiovedenie’, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2023, pp. 30–49.
Rakitianskii, N. M. Mental’nye issledovaniia global’nykh politicheskikh mirov. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 2020.
Rashdall, H. The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages: In 3 vols., Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1936.
Rubinskii, Iu. I. Primety vremeni, Vol. 3: Frantsiia na novykh rubezhakh. Moscow: Institut Evropy RAN, 2018.
Russell, B. Istoriia zapadnoi filosofii. Filosofiia novogo vremeni. Moscow: Mif, 1993.
Saint Bernard de Clairvaux. Textes choisis, eds. A. Béchin, and P. Zumthor. Paris: Egloff, 1947.
Smirnov, A. G. “Elementy varvarskoi i khristianskoi kul’tur v rytsarskom avtostereotipe,” Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 19. Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaia kommunikatsiia, No. 2, 2008, pp. 114–117.
Smith, W. Napoleon III. Paris: Hachette, 1982.
Tarle, E. V. Padenie absoliutizma v Zapadnoi Evrope: istoricheskie ocherki. St. Petersburg; Moscow: Tovarishchestvo M.O. Vol’fa, 1907.
Valensise, M. “Le sacre du roi: stratégie symbolique et doctrine politique de la monarchie française,” Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, Vol. 41, No. 3, 1986, pp. 543–577.
Vipper, Iu. B. “Monten’,” Istoriia vsemirnoi literatury: In 8 vols., ed. G. P. Berdnikov, Vol. 3. Moscow: Nauka, 1985, pp. 270–276.
Vovsi, E. “Napoleonovskaia voennaia elita i novoe imperskoe dvorianstvo, 1808–1814 gody,” Novaia i Noveishaia istoriia, No. 4, 2016, pp. 16–27.
Zemetskii, N. G. “Arianstvo kak ratsionalizatsiia religioznogo opyta,” Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2016, pp. 58–67.
Zhukovskii, A. G. “Spetsifika pozitivistskoi paradigmy politologicheskogo issledovaniia,” Sotsium i vlast’, No. 4, 2011, pp. 66−69.