Personal and Professional Potential of Young Deputies of the State Duma: А Political and Psychological Analysis

The article provides an analysis of the main role characteristics of a parliamentarian, as well as the theoretical foundations of the political and psychological research dealing with the personality of politicians. Based on these foundations, the research provides a model for a political and psychological analysis of the personal and professional potential of young parliamentarians. Methodologically, the research relies on the biographical analysis hand in hand with content analysis, observation, and in-depth interviews. This methodology has been applied to the analysis of the personality of all young deputies of the State Duma, defi ned by their age (under 35). The study shows that among the main traits of the young legislators prevail those related to achievement and power. On the other hand, affi liation appears as the least developed, indicating the dedication of young deputies in the direction of chosen priorities and emphasizing high ambition among their main leadership qualities. In terms of type of political leadership, the majority of young deputies can be labelled as “administrators”, while the number of extroverts exceeds the number of introverts. Most young legislators appear to have low selfesteem and a complex self-concept, factors that enhance their commitment on the one hand, and manageability by the top management on the other. Two archetypes, “Agitator — Apolitical — Motive of Power” and “Administrator — Pragmatist — Motive of Achievement” identifi ed by the research, confi rm the current request from the federal government for “speaking” and subordinated individuals.

References

1. Ashin, G. K. “Poniatie ‘elita’ i ego rol’ v politicheskikh issledovaniiakh,” Filosofskie nauki, No. 7, 2005, pp. 23–43. 
2. Barber, J. D. The Lawmakers: Recruitment and Adaptation to Legislative Life. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1965. 
3. Danilova, A. S., and Palitai, I. S. “Regional’nye rukovoditeli novogo pokoleniia: rezul’taty politiko-psikhologicheskogo analiza,” Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofi ia. Sotsiologiia. Politologiia, No. 54, 2020, pp. 252–262. 
4. De Landsheer, C. “Rol’ lichnosti v politike na primere Evrosoiuza,” Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, No. 2, 2011, pp. 25–35. 
5. De Landtsheer, C., and De Vries, P. “Branding the Image of a Fox: The Psychological Profile of EU President Herman Van Rompuy,” Journal of Political Marketing, Vol. 14, No. 1–2, 2015, pp. 200–222. 
6. Egorova-Gantman, E. V. Igry v soldatiki. Politicheskaia psikhologiia prezidentov. Moscow: Gruppa kompanii «Nikkolo M», 2003. 
7. Gaman-Golutvina, O. V. “Politicheskie elity kak ob”ekt issledovanii v otechestvennoi politicheskoi nauke,” Politicheskaia nauka, No. 2, 2016, pp. 38–73. 
8. Gerasimov, V. M., Derkach, A. A., Kosopkin, A. S., and Nefedova, T. I. Psikhologiia parlamentarizma. Moscow: Status-Kvo, 1999. 
9. Gorodnina, O. S. “K voprosu o psikhologicheskom portretirovanii v politicheskoi nauke,” Abyss (Voprosy fi losofi i, politologii i sotsial’noi antropologii), No. 2, 2018, pp. 97–108. 
10. Lasswell, H. Power and Personality. New York: W.W. Norton, 1948. 
11. Palitai, I. S. “Molodoe pokolenie politikov v sovremennoi Rossii: politikopsikhologicheskii podkhod k issledovaniiu,” Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 12. Politicheskie nauki, No. 3, 2019, pp. 7–22. 
12. Palitai, I. S. “Molodoe pokolenie rossiiskoi politicheskoi elity: statusno-rolevye i lichnostnye kharakteristiki,” Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, No. 5, 2020, pp. 90–100. 
13. Pilet, J. B., and Cross, W. P. The Selection of Political Party Leaders in Contemporary Parliamentory Democracies. London; New York: Routledge, 2014. 
14. Pokatov, D. V. “Rekrutirovanie sovremennoi rossiiskoi politicheskoi elity kak rotatsiia politicheskoi i administrativno-korporativnoi elitnykh grupp,” Vlast’ i elity, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2019, pp. 71–97. 
15. Rakitianskii, N. M. Psikhologicheskoe portretirovanie v politologicheskoi praktike. Moscow: Interpress, 2008. 
16. Sharkov, F. I., Ponedelkov, A. V., and Vorontsov, S. A. “O problemakh sovremennoi rossiiskoi politicheskoi elity i vozmozhnykh napravleniiakh ikh razresheniia,” Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriia: Sotsiologiia, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2017, pp. 524–541. 
17. Smirnova, E. I. “Politicheskoe portretirovanie kak metod analiza politicheskoi elity i perspektivy ego primeneniia v politicheskoi nauke,” Kaspiiskii region: politika, ekonomika, kul’tura, No. 1, 2016, pp. 73–79. 
18. Ziller, R., Stone, W., Jackson, R., and Terbovic, N. “Self-other Orientations and Political Behavior,” A Psychological Examination of Political Leaders, eds. M. Hermann, and T. Milburn. New York: Free Press, 1977, pp. 176–204.