ISSN 0868-4871
En Ru
ISSN 0868-4871
The Representation of the ‘Abroad’ in the Russian Mass Consciousness: A Politico-Psychological Analysis

The Representation of the ‘Abroad’ in the Russian Mass Consciousness: A Politico-Psychological Analysis

Abstract

The article presents an analysis of the perceptions of states belonging to the categories of “near” and “ far abroad”. The representation of the “abroad” have been examined in terms of the attractiveness, strength and assertiveness, focusing on both the rationalized assessments and fully verbalized, unconscious representations of the countries. As result of in-depth interviews and projective techniques, the research analyzed the representation of Ukraine, Belarus, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, the USA, Germany, India, China, Brazil, and Turkey formed in the minds of the respondents. The study shows an unequal perception of these countries, which is infl uenced by a complex set of factors. For countries associated with the “near abroad”, a signifi cant set of factors shaping the perception of the respondents is associated with personal experience, such as living in the specifi c country in the past, or elements of self-identifi cation, such as ethnic, confessional and ethnocultural values. On the other hand, for the perception of countries associated with the “ far-abroad”, important factors are the mutual agreements between the states, the established set of ethnocultural stereotypes, the nature of foreign policy relations and the personal experience of relations with people of the specifi c foreign country. Finally, the perception of both categories, “near” and “ far abroad”, is also infl uenced by the media. Overall, the results of the research show a high impact of the trends in bilateral relations with Russia on a public perception of the specifi c foreign country.

References

  1. Bgazhnokov, B. Kh. “Pozitivnye i negativnye faktory malykh mnogoetnichnykh obshchestv (po materialam issledovanii v Kabardino-Balkarii),” Vestnik Rossiiskoi natsii, No. 5, 2015, pp. 77–92. 
  2. Castano, E., Bonacossa, A., and Gries, P. “National Images as Integrated Schemas: Subliminal Primes of Image Attributes Shape Foreign Policy Preferences,” Political Psychology, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2016, pp. 351–366. 
  3. Chaban, N., Elgström, O., and Gulyaeva, O. “Russian Images of the European Union: Before and after Maidan,” Foreign Policy Analysis, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2017, pp. 480–499. 
  4. Delcour, L., Elsuwege, P. V., and Kostanyan, H. “The Implications of Eurasian Integration for the EU’s Relations with the Countries in the post-Soviet Space,” Studia diplomatica, Vol. 68, No. 1, 2015, pp. 12–14. 
  5. Drobizheva, L. M. “Mezhnatsional’noe soglasie v politike gosudarstva i massovom soznanii,” Vestnik Rossiiskoi natsii, No. 5, 2015, pp. 105–126. 
  6. Kolosov, V. A. “Rossiiskaia geopolitika: traditsionnye kontseptsii i sovremennye vyzovy,” Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, No. 3, 1996, pp. 86–94. 
  7. Neack, L. The New Foreign Policy: U.S. and Comparative Foreign Policy in the 21st Century. New York; Oxford: Rowman & Littlefi eld Publishers, 2003. 
  8. Shestopal, E. B. “Novaia politicheskaia optika Rossii v otnoshenii stran-sosedei,” Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 12: Politicheskie nauki, No. 4, 2017, pp. 122– 126. 
  9. Shestopal, E. B., and Selezneva, A. V. “Sotsiokul’turnye ugrozy i riski v sovremennoi Rossii,” Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, No. 10, 2018, pp. 90–99. 
  10. Shevchenko, V. N. “Globalizatsiia i sud’ba rossiiskoi gosudarstvennosti,” Sud’ba gosudarstva v epokhu globalizatsii, ed. V. N. Shevchenko. Moscow: IF RAN, 2005, pp. 161–199. 
  11. Simonov, A. V. “Vneshnepoliticheskie interesy v politicheskoi teorii i praktike,” Sotsiologiia vlasti, No. 2, 2008, pp. 128–136. 
  12. Yesevi, Ç. G. “New Regionalism in Post-Soviet Territory: Evolution from Eurasian Economic Community to Eurasian Economic Union,” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 23, 2014, pp. 1986–1994. 
  13. Zadorin, I. V., Pereboev, V. S. et al. Integratsionnyi barometr EABR — 2017. St. Petersburg: Tsentr integratsionnykh issledovanii EABR, 2017, URL: https://eabr.org/ upload/iblock/0dc/EDB-Centre_2017_Report-46_EDB-Integration-Barometer_RUS_1.pdf 
  14. Zhirnov, O. A. “Politika Rossii na postsovetskom prostranstve: proshloe, nastoiashchee, budushchee: (Obzor),” Aktual’nye problemy Evropy, No. 2, 2011, pp. 124–163.
PDF, ru

Keywords: near abroad; far abroad; political perception; images of state; factors of political perception; political-psychological approach

Available in the on-line version with: 11.01.2021

To cite this article
Number 6, 2020