ISSN 0868-4871
En Ru
ISSN 0868-4871
Political Criticism of Secularism as the Main Line of Western Modernity in the Journalism of A.I. Solzhenitsyn

Political Criticism of Secularism as the Main Line of Western Modernity in the Journalism of A.I. Solzhenitsyn

Abstract

This article raises questions related to the political interpretation of A.I. Solzhenitsyn. It is demonstrated that Solzhenitsyn’s work in this aspect can be described as a political and philosophical legitimation of the project of “conservative modernity”. The main plot dominant in Solzhenitsyn’s reflections is the political and philosophical criticism of Western secularism and its political consequences. Secularism is described by Solzhenitsyn as a “perversion” of the Christian idea, in this respect Bolshevism and Western liberalism are equated with each other, embodying the radical features of the Western modernist project. The main question that worries Solzhenitsyn: how is modernity possible, in which the basic Christian principles and rules are preserved and developed? The solution to this issue is connected with the political implementation of this project — the construction of a conservative version of democracy, in which the observance of human rights and the construction of a rule of law state is based on Christian, not secular values.

References

Ericson, E. E. “Solzhenitsyn, zapadnye kritiki i voprosy mirovozzreniia, ”Solzhenitsyn. Myslitel’, istorik, khudozhnik, ed. E. E. Ericson. Moscow: Russkii put’, 2010, pp. 5–20.
Giddens, A. Posledstviia sovremennosti. Moscow: Praksis, 2011.
Lübbe, H. V nogu so vremenem. Sokrashchennoe prebyvanie v nastoiashchem, transl. A. Grigor’eva, and V. Kurennogo. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2016.
Marquard, O. “Epokha chuzhdosti miru, ”Otechestvennye zapiski, No. 6, 2003, URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/oz/2003/6/epoha-chuzhdosti-miru.html
Marquard, O. “Zukunft und Herkunft: Bemerkungen zu Joachim Ritters Philosophie der Entzweiung,” Marquard, O. Skepsis und Zustimmung: Philosophische Studien. Stuttgart: Reclam, 1994, pp. 15–29.
Mezhuev, B. V. “Molchanie i bezdeistvie. Razmyshleniia o politicheskoi sud’be Aleksandra Solzhenitsyna,” Tetradi po konservatizmu, No. 1, 2019, pp. 27–36.
Rumiantseva, M. V. “Kompensatornaia teoriia v rabotakh Germana Liubbe i Odo Markvarda, ”Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni A. S. Pushkina, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2015, pp. 140–150.
Shchipkov, V. A. “Nominalistskie predposylki sekuliarizma i ego aktual’noe znachenie v Rossii i na Zapade,” Tetradi po konservatizmu, No. 1, 2019, pp. 37–45.
Solzhenitsyn, A. I. Kak nam obustroit’ Rossiiu? St. Petersburg: Azbuka, 2015.
Stepun, F. A. “Chaemaia Rossiia,” Stepun, F. A. Izbrannye trudy. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2010, pp. 434–460.
Treadgold, D. W. “Intellektual’nye predshestvenniki Solzhenitsyna,” Solzhenitsyn. Myslitel’, istorik, khudozhnik, ed. E. E. Ericson. Moscow: Russkii put’, 2010, pp. 235–259.

Keywords: secularization; modernity; West; Russia; democracy; conservatism

DOI Number: 10.55959/MSU0868-4871-12-2023-1-3-131-144

Available in the on-line version with: 15.06.2023

To cite this article
Number 3, 2023