ISSN 0868-4871
En Ru
ISSN 0868-4871
Life Cycle: The Emergence and Decline of Dominant Parties in Democracies

Life Cycle: The Emergence and Decline of Dominant Parties in Democracies

Abstract

Liberal democracy theory allows for the existence of the dominant party in the system recognized as a competitive democracy. Being an integral part of actual liberal democracies, dominant parties make a considerable impact on the theoretical underpinnings of such systems and their functioning, which is a justifi cation for studying their features and behaviour patterns with the aim of uncovering their emergence, development and decline mechanisms. The article looks into the phenomenon of the dominant party drawing on the seven widely acknowledged and signifi cant cases (Italy, Germany, India, Japan, South Africa, Ishuv-Israel, Sweden) and puts forward a new defi nition of the dominant party grounded in empirical data. The article also provides an analysis of the internal structure and the essential features of the functioning of dominant parties and presents conclusions about the causes of the emergence and development of dominant parties and the reasons for them retaining this status.

References

  1. Anokhina, N. V., and Meleshkina, E. Iu. (eds.) Partiia i vybory: Khrestomatiia, Vol. 1. Moscow: INION RAN, 2004. 
  2. Deviatkina, T. F. Indiiskii natsional’nyi kongress (1947–1964). Moscow: Nauka, 1970. 
  3. Dimanis, M. D. “Politicheskie partii FRG: Kontseptual’nye podkhody k gosudarstvu, 1945–1995 gody,” Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnaia politika, No. 12, 1997, pp. 121–128. 
  4. Electoral Studies, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2001: Party System Dynamics in Japan and Italy, ed. M. Laver. 
  5. Epshtein, A. Genezis i zakat ‘levogo’ Izrailia. Moscow: Institut Blizhnego Vostoka, 2011. 
  6. Gaiduk, V. P. Khristianskaia demokratiia v Italii (60–70-e gody). Moscow: Nauka, 1985. 
  7. Gehler, M., and Kaiser, W. Christian Democracy in Europe since 1945, Vol. 2. London: Routledge, 2004. 
  8. Geizel’, Z. Politicheskie struktury gosudarstva Izrail’. Moscow: Institut izucheniia Izrailia i Blizhnego Vostoka, 2001. 
  9. Granieri, R. The Ambivalent Alliance: Konrad Adenauer, the CDU/CSU, and the West, 1949–1966. New York: Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2003. 
  10. Hadenius, S. Swedish Politics during the 20th Century. Stockholm: Swed. Inst. Cop., 1990. 
  11. Kalmychek, P. A., and Strel’tsov, D. V. Politicheskaia sistema sovremennoi Iaponii. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2013. 
  12. Kaushik, P. The Congress Ideology and Programme (1920–1985). New Delhi: Gitanjaly Publ. House, 1986. 
  13. Khusnitdinov, A. Z. Osobennosti razvitiia partiino-politicheskoi sistemy Indii i elektoral’nykh protsessov na rubezhe XX–XXI vekov: Postgraduate Thesis. Moscow, 2010. 
  14. Lijphart, A. Demokratiia v mnogosostavnykh obshchestvakh. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 1997. 
  15. Lijphart, A. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999. 
  16. Makarenko, B. I. (ed.) Partii i partiinye sistemy: sovremennye tendentsii razvitiia. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2015. 
  17. Medding, P. The Founding of Israel Democracy, 1948–1967. London: Oxford University Press, 1990. 
  18. Misgeld, K. Sozdavaia sotsial’nuiu demokratiiu: Sto let Sotsial-demokraticheskoi rabochei partii Shvetsii. Moscow.: Ves’ mir, 2001. 
  19. Mitchell, M. The Origins of Christian Democracy: Politics and Confession in Modern Germany. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 2012. 
  20. Pavlenko, P. A. Liberal’no-demokraticheskaia partiia v politicheskoi sisteme sovremennoi Iaponii (1955–2001). Moscow: Airo-XXI, 2006. 
  21. Peretz, M. The Israeli Left History, Problems, Documents. San Diego: New York Barnes Cop., 1980. 
  22. Petelin, B. V. KhDS/KhSS i ob“edinenie Germanii. Vologda: Rus‘, 2002. 
  23. Pridham, G. Christian Democracy in Western Germany (RLE: German Politics): The CDU/CSU in Government and Opposition, 1945–1976. London: Routledge, 2014. 
  24. Prokopenko, L. Ia., and Skubko, Iu. S. Problemy sovremennogo sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo i politicheskogo razvitiia IuAR. Moscow: Izd. I. B. Belyi, 2013. 
  25. Reginin, A. I. Indiiskii natsional’nyi kongress: ocherki ideologii i politiki (60-e i pervaia polovina 70-kh godov). Moscow: Nauka, 1978. 
  26. Riabichenko, A. V., and Shenderiuk, M. G. “Transformatsiia partiino-politicheskoi sistemy Shvetsii v kontse 20 — nachale 21 veka,” Baltiiskii region, No. 3, 2013, pp. 146–159. 
  27. Saiurov, N. F. Partii v politicheskoi sisteme germanskogo obshchestva. Lipetsk: Lipetskii ekologo-gumanitarnyi institut, 2000. 
  28. Sartori, G. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2005. 
  29. Senatorov, A. I. Politicheskie partii Iaponii: sravnitel’nyi analiz programm, organizatsii i parlamentskoi deiatel’nosti (1945–1992). Moscow: Vostochnaia literatura, 1995. 
  30. Shubin, G. V. Problemy razvitiia demokraticheskoi Iuzhnoi Afriki (1994–2006 gody). Moscow: Institut Afriki RAN, 2006. 
  31. Shubin, V. G. Iuzhnaia Afrika: Ocherki sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo i politicheskogo razvitiia. Moscow: Vostochnaia literature, 1999. 
  32. Sontheimer, K. Federativnaia respublika Germaniia segodnia. Osnovnye cherty politicheskoi sistemy, transl. G. Ia. Rudogo. Moscow: Pamiatniki istoricheskoi mysli, 1996. 
  33. Spasskii, E. N. Germanskie politicheskie partii v protsesse i posle ob”edineniia Germanii: mekhanizmy konkurentsii i tendentsii evoliutsii. Khabarovsk: DVGU Press, 2006. 
  34. Strel’tsov, D. V. Iaponiia posle smeny vlasti. Moscow: Vostochnaia literatura, 2011. 
  35. Terekhov, M. A. Istoricheskii opyt formirovaniia partiino-gosudarstvennoi sistemy Izrailia: 1948–2008 gody: Postgraduate Thesis. Moscow, 2010. 
  36. Torous, N. A. Formirovanie i funktsionirovanie partiino-politicheskoi sistemy Izrailia v usloviiakh stanovleniia gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva: Postgraduate Thesis. St. Petersburg, 2012. 
  37. Tsvetova, I. A. Evoliutsiia sovremennoi partiino-politicheskoi sistemy Iaponii. Moscow: Institut Dal’nego Vostoka RAN, 2002. 
  38. Zakaria, R. 100 Glorious Years: Indian National Congress, 1885–1985. Bombay: Tata Press, 1985.
PDF, ru

Keywords: democratic regimes, parties and party systems, systems with the dominant party, dominant party

Available in the on-line version with: 31.12.2020

To cite this article
Number 3, 2018