ISSN 0868-4871
En Ru
ISSN 0868-4871
The Relationship of the Concepts ‘Political Myth’ and ‘Historical Myth’

The Relationship of the Concepts ‘Political Myth’ and ‘Historical Myth’

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to clarify the term “historical myth” and to defi ne its relation to the notion of “political myth.” The goals of the research are to determine the content of the concept “historical myth,” to understand the essence of the concept “political myth” and to compare the meanings of the two terms. The author uses traditional and typological analysis, and also applies the method of expert interview. The article argues the position that the historical myth is a particular form of the myth of the political. Accordingly, the historical myth initially represents an artifi cially constructed form of perception of the world, based on an appeal to the sphere of emotions and aimed at manipulating the public consciousness. At the same time, it has the property of acquiring autonomy over time, infl uencing its own creators. The specifi c factor diff erentiating the historical myth is that it is constructed with the help of historical facts and changes the perception of reality by changing the model of perception of events of the past.

References

  1. Alekseev, S. V. “Kruglyi stol ‘Vliianie istoricheskikh fal’sifi katsii i mifov na soznanie i sotsial’noe povedenie sovremennoi rossiiskoi molodezhi’,” Nauchnye trudy Moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta, No. 2, 2015, pp. 106–108. 
  2. Arkhipova, Iu. V. “Politicheskie mify kak sredstvo konstruirovaniia novoi politicheskoi real’nosti,” Chelovecheskii capital, No. 4, 2013, pp. 85–89. 
  3. Edelman, M. Political Language. Words That Succeed and Policies That Fail. New York: Department of Political Science and Institute for Research on Poverty, 1977. 
  4. Evgen’eva, T. V., and Selezneva, A. V. “Obraz ‘vraga’ kak faktor formirovaniia natsional’noi identichnosti sovremennoi rossiiskoi molodezhi,” Politiia: Vestnik Fonda ‘Rossiiskii obshchestvenno-politicheskii tsentr’, No. 3, 2007, pp. 83–92. 
  5. German, R. E. “Istoricheskoe proshloe v strukture politicheskogo mifa: analiz teoreticheskogo naslediia,” Istoricheskie, fi losofskie, politicheskie i iuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiia i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, No. 11–2, 2013, pp. 46–49. 
  6. Korn, M. G. “Politicheskii mif kak znachimaia chast’ ‘obrazov proshlogo’,” Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv, No. 6, 2007, pp. 118–122. 
  7. Kozlov, M. “Natsional’naia ideia Rossii pered istoricheskimi vyzovami Zapada: politicheskie mify i nravstvennye orientiry,” Diplomaticheskaia sluzhba, No. 5, 2013, pp. 50–56. 
  8. Kriakvina, E. A. “Politicheskie mify v strukturatsii politicheskogo prostranstva,” Sotsiologiia vlasti, No. 7, 2009, pp. 167–173. 
  9. Makovskaia, D. V. “Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty konstruirovaniia istoricheskikh mifov: etnokonfl iktologicheskoe izmerenie,” Metamorfozy vs Transformatsiia. Mul’tidistsiplinarnyi podkhod k izucheniiu istorii adygov v 19−21 vekakh: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Rostov na Donu: Iuzhnyi federal’nyi universitet, 2013, pp. 48–55. 
  10. Malinova, O. Iu. “Tema imperii v sovremennykh rossiiskikh politicheskikh diskursakh,” Nasledie imperii i budushchee Rossii. Moscow: Fond «Liberal’naia missiia»; Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2008, pp. 59–102. 
  11. Malinova, O. Iu. “Tema proshlogo v ritorike prezidentov Rossii,” Pro et Contra, Vol. 15, No. 3–4, 2011, pp. 106–122. 
  12. Malinova, O. Iu. Konstruirovanie smyslov: issledovanie simvolicheskoi politiki v sovremennoi Rossii. Moscow: Institut nauchnoi informatsii po obshchestvennym naukam RAN, 2013. 
  13. Ol’shanskii, D. V. Psikhologiia mass. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2002. Potseluev, S. P. “Simvolicheskaia politika: konstelliatsiia poniatii dlia podkhoda k problem,” Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, No. 5, 1999, pp. 62–75. 
  14. Satyrenko, A., and Gurzhii, T. Legendy i mify Moskvy. Moscow: Franciscans Press, 1997. 
  15. Shestov, N. I. Politicheskii mif teper’ i prezhde. Moscow: OLMA-PRESS, 2005. 
  16. Shubin, A. V. “Istoricheskoe soznanie i istoricheskie mify,” Problemy istoricheskogo poznaniia, No. 1, 2014, pp. 4. 
  17. Sighele, S. Prestupnaia tolpa. Opyt kollektivnoi psikhologii. Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2011. 
  18. Strukova, E. N. Al’ternativnaia periodicheskaia pechat’ v istorii rossiiskoi mnogopartiinosti (1987–1996), ed. V. I. Tropina. Moscow: Istoricheskaia biblioteka, 2005. 
  19. Syrov, V. N. “Chto schitat’ istoricheskimi mifami,” Konstruktivnye i destruktivnye formy mifologizatsii sotsial’noi pamiati v proshlom i nastoiashchem: Sbornik statei i tezisov dokladov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii ‘Konstruktivnye i destruktivnye formy mifologizatsii sotsial’noi pamiati v proshlom i nastoiashchem’, Lipetsk, 24–26 sentiabria 2015 goda. Tambov: Izdatel’stvo R.V. Pershina, 2015, pp. 6–16.
PDF, ru

Keywords: political myth, historical myth, manipulative technologies, symbolic policy, memorial policy

Available in the on-line version with: 31.12.2020

To cite this article
Number 3, 2018