Features of the Development of Humanitarian Discourse in Soviet Political Practice

Abstract

This article attempts to analyze the evolution of the political identity of the Soviet Union in the context of the transformation of humanitarian discourse. This discourse can be defi ned as a set of ideas transmitted in a political language about the sociopolitical identity of a person, his rights and freedoms. Analyzing the development of the system of ideas about man, rights and freedoms in the offi cial Soviet discourse, the article demonstrates how such ideas formed the collective political identity of the Soviet state at various historical stages. The author concludes that Soviet ideology and offi cial political discourse throughout the entire period of existence of the Soviet state reproduced the concept of humanitarian universalism, which was an alternative to Western humanitarian discourse and constituted both the Soviet strategy of foreign policy and the international identity of the Soviet state overall.

References

1. Aron, R. Demokratiia i totalitarizm. Moscow: Tekst, 1993. 
2. Bell, P. M. H. John Bull and the Bear: British Public Opinion, Foreign Policy, and the Soviet Union, 1941–1945. London: Edward Arnold, 1990. 
3. Bikbov, A. T. Grammatika poriadka: Istoricheskaia sotsiologiia poniatii, kotorye meniaiut nashu real’nost’. Moscow: High School Economics Press, 2014. 
4. Brutents, K. N. Nesbyvsheesia. Neravnodushnye zametki o perestroike. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, 2005. 
5. Chkhikvadze, V. M. Sotsialisticheskii gumanizm i prava cheloveka. Leninskie idei i sovremennost’. Moscow: Nauka, 1978. 
6. Gorbachev, M. S. Perestroika i novoe myshlenie dlia nashei strany i dlia vsego mira. Moscow: Politizdat, 1988. 
7. Gor’kii, M. “Proletarskii gumanizm,” ibid. Sobranie sochinenii: In 30 vol., Vol. 27: Stat’i, doklady, rechi, privetstviia (1933–1936). Moscow: GIKhL, 1953, pp. 233–241. 
8. Iakovlev, A.N. et al. Perestroika i sovremennyi mir, ed. T. T. Timofeev. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, 1989. 
9. Istoriia Vsesoiuznoi kommunisticheskoi partii (bol’shevikov): Kratkii kurs, ed. Komissiia TsK VKP(b). Moscow: OGIZ; Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1946. 
10. Kapustin, B. G. Sovremennost’ kak predmet politicheskoi teorii. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 1998. 
11. Kotkin, S. “Novye vremena: Sovetskii Soiuz v mezhvoennom tsivilizatsionnom kontekste,” Mishel’ Fuko i Rossiia: Sbornik statei, ed. O. Kharkhordin. St. Petersburg; Moscow: Evropeiskii universitet v Sankt-Peterburge: Letnii sad, 2001, pp. 239–315. 
12. Mal’tsev, G. V. “Sotsialisticheskii gumanizm i prava cheloveka,” Pravovedenie, No. 5, 1977, pp. 24–34. 
13. Marx, K., and Engels, F. “Manifest kommunisticheskoi partii,” Ibid. Izbrannye proizvedeniia: In 2 vol., Vol. I. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1952.
14. Neumann, I. Ispol’zovanie ‘Drugogo’: Obrazy Vostoka v formirovanii evropeiskikh identichnostei, transl. V. B. Litvinova and I. A. Pil’shchikova; ed. A. I. Millera. Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo, 2004. 
15. Programma Kommunisticheskoi partii Sovetskogo Soiuza. Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1961. 
16. Shumilov, Iu. V. “Rol’ Genuezskoi konferentsii 1922 goda i mezhdunarodnykh konferentsii 20–30-kh godov 20 veka v razvitii mezhdunarodnogo fi nansovogo prava,” Evraziiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal, No. 2, 2010, pp. 38–42. 
17. Slovar’ v pomoshch’ izbirateliu. K vyboram v Verkhovnyi Sovet SSSR. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe izdatel’stvo, 1937. 
18. Waltzer, M. “Sfery priviazannosti,” Logos, No. 2, 2006, pp. 128–129. 
19. Wells, H. Opyt avtobiografi i: Otkrytiia i zakliucheniia odnogo vpolne zauriadnogo uma (nachinaia s 1866 goda). Moscow: Ladomir: Nauka, 2007. 
20. Žižek, S. “Esli Bog est’, to vse pozvoleno,” Internet-zhurnal ‘Liva,’ April 25, 2012, URL: http://liva.com.ua/zizek-religion.html