ISSN 0868-4871
En Ru
ISSN 0868-4871
From Politization of Human Rights to the Formation of Universal Identity: An Analysis of the Evolution of Western Humanitarian Discourse

From Politization of Human Rights to the Formation of Universal Identity: An Analysis of the Evolution of Western Humanitarian Discourse

Abstract

This article is devoted to the study of the evolution of humanitarian discourse in the nations of the West after the Second World War. Analyzing the transformation of approaches to the interpretation of human rights, human security and development presented in the program documents and political practice of the European Union countries and the USA, the author addresses the relationship between the politicization of humanitarian discourse and the universalization of the Western political identity.

References

  1. Bartenev, V. I. “Cek’iuritizatsiia sfery sodeistviia mezhdunarodnomu razvitiiu: analiz politicheskogo diskursa,” Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii, No. 3, 2011, pp. 37–50. 
  2. Inozemtsev, N. N. Vneshniaia politika SShA v epokhu imperializma. Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1960. 
  3. Morozov, V. E. Rossiia i Drugie: identichnost’ i granitsy politicheskogo soobshchestva. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2009. 
  4. Sukharev, A. I. Politicheskoe stanovlenie sub”ektov setevykh gumanitarnykh vzaimodeistvii v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniiakh global’nogo mira: Thesis. Moscow, 2011. 
  5. Sukharev, A. I. Transgumanitarnoe izmerenie politiki: Opyt issledovaniia institutsionalizatsii NPO-seti v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniiakh. Moscow: Kniga i biznes, 2009. 
  6. Habermas J., and Derrida, J. “February 15, or What Binds Europeans Together: A Plea for a Common Foreign Policy, Beginning in the Core of Europe,” Constellations, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2003, pp. 291–297. 
  7. Acosta, E. “Interview with Ernesto Laclau,” Re-thinking Europe, No. 1, 2011, pp. 85–89. 
  8. Apodaca, C. Understanding U.S. Human Rights Policy: Aparadoxical Legacy. New York; London: Routledge, 2006. 
  9. Baker, P. “Human Rights, Europe and the People’s Republic of China,” The China Quarterly, Vol. 169, 2002, pp. 45–63. 
  10. Balducci, G. The Study of the EU Promotion of Human Rights: the Importance of International and Internal Factors. Warwick: University of Warwick, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, 2008, (Garnet Working Paper, 2008, No. 61/08), URL: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/researchcentres/csgr/ garnet/workingpapers/6108.pdf 
  11. Fierro, E. The EU’s Approach to Human Rights Conditionality in Practice. Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004. 
  12. Habermas, J. “Europe’s Post-democratic Era,” The Guardian, November 10, 2011, URL: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/nov/10/jurgen-habermaseurope-post-democratic 
  13. Holland, M. The EU Union and the Third World. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002. 
  14. Ignatieff , M. The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004. 
  15. Lerch, M. “European Identity in International Society — A Constructivist Analysis of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights,” ConWEB: Webpapers on Constitutionalism & Governance beyond the State, No. 2, 2003, pp. 1–31.
PDF, ru

Keywords: humanitarian discourse, political identity, securitization, European Union, USA, human rights, security

Available in the on-line version with: 31.12.2020

To cite this article
Number 6, 2018