“Prospects of Materialism in International Relations Theory,”

Abstract

One of the achievements of the reflectivist turn in international relations theory in the late 20th century was the attention given to the role of discourse and other ideational factors in international politics. In recent years, however, approaches critical of the discursive emphasis in international studies have emerged, seeking to restore the significance of non-discursive aspects of international relations such as geography, technology, and the non-human. This article offers a perspective on the development of international relations theory from the standpoint of the debate between materialism and idealism. Within this framework, it provides a brief overview of the historical evolution of international relations theory and subsequently delves into a detailed analysis of three strands of the new wave of materialist theorizing in the field — critical realism, new materialism, and neoclassical geopolitics. The article suggests considering the new materialist wave as, on the whole, a positive development, but also points out the necessity of taking into account the risk of “exiling” the human element from international relations research as such concepts proliferate. The possibility of collaboration between reflecivists and post-reflecivists, as well as between idealists and materialists in general, is underlined for the comprehensive study of contemporary international realities.

References

Alekseeva, T. A. “Khimery strany Oz: ‘kul’turnyi povorot’ v teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii,” Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2012, pp. 4–19.
Alekseeva, T. A. “ ‘Tret’e pokolenie’ konstruktivizma: chto novogo?” Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye znaniia, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2022, pp. 6–21.
Bennett, J. C. The Anglosphere Challenge: Why the English-speaking Nations Will Lead the Way in the Twenty-first Century. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.
Carr, E. H. “Dvadtsat’ let krizisa: 1919–1939. Vvedenie v izuchenie mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii,” Teoriia mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: Khrestomatiia, ed. P. A. Tsygankov. Moscwo: Gardariki, 2002, pp. 53–68.
Chernov, I. V. “Postkonstruktivizm, ili Teoriia lingvopoliticheskogo realizma v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniiakh,” Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Politologiia. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2018, pp. 86–104.
Coole, D., and Frost, S. (eds.) Frost New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency and Politics. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.
Coole, D., and Frost, S. “Introducing the New Materialisms,” New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency and Politics, eds. D. Coole, and S. Frost. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010, pp. 3–43.
Cudworth, E., Hobden, S., and Kavalski, E. (eds.) Posthuman Dialogues in International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018.
Dolman, E. Astropolitik: Classical Geopolitics in the Space Age. London: Frank Cass, 2002.
Dugin, A. G. Geopolitika: uchebnoe posobie. Moscow: Gaudeamus, 2011.
Glasius, M., Warnaar, M., Holman, O. et al. “Gramsci for the Twenty-first Century: Dialectics and Translatability,” International Studies Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2012, pp. 666–686.
Haverluk, T. W., Beauchemin, K. M., and Mueller, B. A. “The Three Critical Flaws of Critical Geopolitics: Towards a Neo-Classical Geopolitics,” Geopolitics, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2014, pp. 19–39.
Hay, C. Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction. [Bloomsbury]: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2017.
Iudin, N. V. “V poiskakh nauki o mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniiakh: vzgliad cherez prizmu kriticheskogo realizma,” Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2020, pp. 135–151.
Joseph, J. “Hegemony and the Structure-agency Problem in International Relations: A Scientific Realist Contribution,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2008, pp. 109–128.
Joseph, J. “The Impact of Roy Bhaskar and Critical Realism on International Relations,” E-International Relations, December 11, 2014, URL: https://www.e-ir.info/2014/12/11/the-impact-of-roy-bhaskar-and-critical-realism-on-internationalrelations/
Keohane, R. O. “Ideas Part-way Down,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2000, pp. 125–130.
Laclau, E., and Bhaskar, R. S. “Discourse Theory vs Critical Realism,” Alethia, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1998, pp. 9–14.
Lundborg, T., and Vaughan-Williams, N. “New Materialisms, Discourse Analysis, and International Relations: A Radical Intertextual Approach,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2014, pp. 3–25.
Mac Ginty, R. “A Material Turn in International Relations: The 4x4, Intervention and Resistance,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2017, pp. 855–874.
Mackinder, H. Democratic Ideals and Reality: A Study in the Politics of Reconstruction. London: Constable and Company, 1919.
Mackinder, H. “Geograficheskaia os’ istorii,” Dugin, A. Osnovy geopolitiki. Moscow: ARKTOGEIa-tsentr, 2000, pp. 491–506.
Marsh, D. “Keeping Ideas in their Place: In Praise of Thin Constructivism,” Australian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 44, No. 4, 2009, pp. 679–696.
McCarthy, D. R. “Materialism in International Politics,” Studying International Relations: A Companion, eds. H. Behr, R. Foster. (in press) McCarthy, D. R. (ed.) Technology and World Politics: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 2017.
Megoran, N. “Neoclassical Geopolitics,” Political Geography, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2010, pp. 187–189.
Meibauer, G. “Interests, Ideas, and the Study of State Behaviour in Neoclassical Realism,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2020, pp. 20–36.
Morgado, N. “Neoclassical Geopolitics: Preliminary Theoretical Principles and Methodological Guidelines,” Medjunarodni problemi, Vol. 72, No. 1, 2020, pp. 129–157.
Morrissey, J. “Closing the Neoliberal Gap: Risk and Regulation in the Long War of Securitization,” Antipode, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2011, pp. 874–900.
Okunev, I. Iu. “Metodologicheskii sintez v sovremennoi geopolitike: navstrechu neoklassicheskoi (postkriticheskoi) geopolitike,” Politicheskaia nauka, No. 2, 2015, pp. 26–38.
Penttinen, E. “Potential of Posthumanist Onto-epistemology for the Study of International Relations,” Posthuman Dialogues in International Relations, eds. E. Cudworth, S. Hobden, and E. Kavalski. Abington: Routledge, 2018, pp. 72–88.
Protevi, J. Life, War, Earth: Deleuze and the Sciences. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.
Raudino, S., and Rendon, E. “Material Forces and the Force of Ideas: Interview with Robert Gilpin,” The International Spectator, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2005, pp. 99–105.
Scholvin, S., and Wigell, M. Geo-Economics as Concept and Practice in International Relations: Surveying the State of the Art. Helsinki: Finish Institute of International Affairs, 2018, URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/upi-live/2018/04/wp102_geoeconomics.pdf
Simmerl, G. A Critical Constructivist Perspective on Global Multi-Level Governance: Discursive Struggles among Multiple Actors in a Globalized Political Space. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin. 2011.
Sims-Schouten, W., Riley, S., and Willig, C. “Critical Realism in Discourse Analysis: A Presentation of a Systematic Method of Analysis Using Women’s Talk of Motherhood, Childcare and Female Employment as an Example,” Theory & Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2007, pp. 101–124.
Srnicek, N. “New Materialism and Posthumanism: Bodies, Brains, and Complex Causality,” Technology and World Politics: An Introduction, ed. D. R. McCarthy. London: Routledge, 2017, pp. 86–89.
Srnicek, N., Fotou, M., and Arghand, E. “Introduction: Materialism and World Politics,” Millennium, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2013, pp. 397.
Wendt, A. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.