ISSN 0868-4871
En Ru
ISSN 0868-4871
In the EU and NATO but Close to Russia — Post- Crimean Sentiment in Bulgaria and Hungary

In the EU and NATO but Close to Russia — Post- Crimean Sentiment in Bulgaria and Hungary

Abstract

This article is devoted to the study of the attitude of the inhabitants of Bulgaria and Hungary to Russia and Russian politics after the annexation of Crimea in 2014 and in the context of Russian-Ukrainian confl ict relations. The authors of the article note that today in the Bulgarian and Hungarian societies there is a split of public opinion into Pro-Western and Pro-Russian camps. Using the method of regression analysis, the authors demonstrate that such a split has its own specifi cs in both countries. It is most signifi cantly manifested in the political life of Bulgaria, where the division East / West structures the party and political system of the country. The article highlights the geopolitical orientation and support of President Vladimir Putin as the key factors infl uencing the “post-Crimean” attitude of Bulgarians and Hungarians to Russia.

References

  1. Borhi, L. Hungary in the Cold War, 1945–1956: between the United States and the Soviet Union. Budapest and New York: CEU Press, 2004. 
  2. Brzezinski, Z. K. The Soviet Bloc: Unity and Confl ict. New York: Praeger, 1965. 
  3. Crampton, R. J. A Short History of Modern Bulgaria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 
  4. Deegan-Krause, K. “Full and Partial Cleavages,” Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe, eds. S. Berglund, J. Ekman, K. Deegan-Krause, and T. Knutsen. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013, pp. 35–50. 
  5. Ekman, J., Berglund, S., and Duvold, K. Post-Crimea Barometer: Attitudes towards Russia in Bulgaria, Hungary and Latvia. Stockholm: Centre for East European and Baltic Studies (CEEBS), South Stockholm University, 2015. 
  6. Gati, Ch. Failed Illusions: Moscow, Washington, Budapest and the 1956 
  7. Hungarian Revolt. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2006. 
  8. Karasimeonov, G. “Between Democracy and Authoritarianism in Bulgaria,” Cleavages, Parties and Voters: Studies from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Romania, eds. K. Lawson, A. Römmele, and G. Karasimeonov. Westport: Praeger, 1999. P. 37–46. 
  9. Karasimeonov, G. Partiinata sistema v Bulgariia. 3rd ed. Sofiia: NIK, 2010. 
  10. Karasimeonov, G., and Lyubenov, M. “Bulgaria,” Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe, eds. S. Berglund, J. Ekman, K. Deegan-Krause, and T. Knutsen. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013, pp. 407–442. 
  11. Markov, G. Iz istoriiata na bulgarskata narodnost i drzhava. Sofi ia: Pelikan Alfa, 1993. 
  12. Moser, C. A. Theory and History of the Bulgarian Transition. Sofi a: Free Initiative Foundation, 1994. 
  13. Pammer, M. “Austria and the Hungarian Revolution 1956,” Austrian Press & Information Service, 2006, URL: http://www.austrianinformation.org/septemberoctober/ 2006/11/8/austria-and-the-hungarian-revolution-1956.html 
  14. Politicheskiiat protses i obshchestvenoto mnenie v Bulgariia prez 2014 g.: Godishen obzor. Sofiia: Gallup International, 2015. 
  15. Radev, S. Stroitelite na svremenna Bulgariia, Vol. 3. Sofi ia: Sv. Kliment Okhridski, 2009. 
  16. Tóka, G., and Popa, S. “Hungary,” Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe, eds. S. Berglund, J. Ekman, K. Deegan-Krause, and T. Knutsen. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013, pp. 291–338.
PDF, ru

Keywords: Bulgaria, Hungary, Russia, Crimea, European Union, geopolitics, Fidesz (Hungarian Civic Alliance), Bulgarian Socialist Party, Vladimir Putin

Available in the on-line version with: 31.12.2020

To cite this article
Number 2, 2019