ISSN 0868-4871
En Ru
ISSN 0868-4871
Political-Philosophical and Sociological Aspects of the Regulation of Violence in International Relations

Political-Philosophical and Sociological Aspects of the Regulation of Violence in International Relations

Abstract

The author examines the political-philosophical and sociological aspects of the formatting of violence in international relations (IR). The study reactualizes concepts aimed at the advancement of the world community toward social justice and the absence of war based on the optimization of political and legal regulation of IR. The analysis connects the teleology of “social justice” with the functional and systemic approaches to the hierarchy of regulators of violence, which theoretically substantiates the prospects of international “pacifi cation.” The activation of the problem of progress towards social justice was stimulated in international-political theory both by the memory of the world wars and the Cold War and by modern changes in social reality — the turbulence of world politics. Such a hierarchy is an indispensable condition for overcoming the imbalances that arise in the anarchistic variety of regulators; it orders the subordination of regulatory complexes (formats) that determine the regulation of international relations.

References

  1. Aron, R. Etapy razvitiia sotsiologicheskoi mysli. Moscow: Progress, 1993. 
  2. Aron, R. Mir i voina mezhdu narodami. Moscow: NOTA BENE, 2000. 
  3. Brizkun, K. A. “O vidakh rekomendatel’nykh aktov mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii i formakh ikh vliianiia na natsional’noe zakonodatel’stvo,” Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava, No. 8, 2010, pp. 111–119. 
  4. Degterev, D. A. Prikladnoi kolichestvennyi analiz i modelirovanie mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. Moscow: RUDN, 2016. 
  5. Etzioni, A. Ot imperii k obshchestvu: novyi podkhod k mezhdunarodnym otnosheniiam. Moscow: Ladomir, 2004. 
  6. Filippov, A. F. “Sotsiologiia i kosmos,” Sotsiologos, Vol. 1: Obshchestvo i sfery smysla, ed. V. V. Vinokurov and A. F. Filippov. Moscow: Progress, 1991, pp. 241–273. 
  7. Finnemore, M., and Sikkink, K. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4, 1998, pp. 887–917. 
  8. Finnemore, М. “Legitimacy, Hypocrisy and the Social Structure of Unipolarity: Why Being a Unipole Isn’t Cracked Up to Be,” World Politics, Vol. 61, No. 1, 2009, pp. 58–85. 
  9. Hongwei Li. “Seven Balls Can’t Fall: The World Order Reconstruction Under the Geopolitics’ Perspective,” International and Public Aff airs, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2018, pp. 83–96. 
  10. Inkenberry, J. After Victory. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001. 
  11. Kirton, J. J. “Model’ upravleniia ‘Gruppoi dvadtsati’,” Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii, No. 3, 2013, pp. 5–30. 
  12. Lloyd George, D. Evropeiskii khaos. Moscow: Iurait, 2019. 
  13. Luhmann, N. “Globalizatsiia mirovogo soobshchestva: kak sleduet ponimat’ sovremennoe obshchestvo,” Sotsiologiia na poroge 21 veka: osnovnye napravleniia issledovanii, ed. S. I. Grigor’ev, and J. Coenen-Hutter. Moscow: Rusaki, 1999, pp. 128–143. 
  14. Luhmann, N. Sotsial’nye sistemy. Ocherk obshchei teorii. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2007. 
  15. Luhmann, N. Vlast’. Moscow: Praksis, 2001. 
  16. Mal’tsev, G. V. Sotsial’nye osnovaniia prava. Moscow: Norma: INFRA-M, 2011. 
  17. Maritain, J. Chelovek i gosudarstvo. Moscow: Ideia-Press, 2000. 
  18. Müllerson, R. “Dva mira — dva prava? Geopolitika pod prikrytiem zakonnosti i morali,” Rossiia v global’noi politike, No. 2, 2014, pp. 86–95. 
  19. Nazarchuk, A. V. Uchenie N. Lumana o kommunikatsii. Moscow: Ves’ mir, 2012. 
  20. North, D., Wallis, J., and Weingast, B. Nasilie i sotsial’nye poriadki. Kontseptual’nye ramki dlia interpretatsii pis’mennoi istorii chelovechestva. Moscow: Institut Gaidara, 2011. 
  21. Rzheshevskii, O. A. Stalin i Cherchill’. Vstrechi, besedy, diskussii, kommentarii. 1941–1945. Moscow: Nauka, 2004. 
  22. Shakhalilov, Sh. Sh. “Mirovoi poriadok: problemy transformatsii,” Mezhdunarodnaia zhizn‘, No. 9, 2016, pp. 112–128. 
  23. Timofeev, I. “Mirovoi (bes)poriadok. Preimushchestvo dlia Rossii?” Valdai. Mezhdunarodnyi diskussionnyi klub, June 29, 2016, URL: http://ru.valdaiclub.com/a/ highlights/mirovoy-bes-poryadok-preimushchestvo-dlya-rossii/ 
  24. Tsygankov, P. A. (ed.) Gibridizatsiia mirovoi i vneshnei politiki v svete sotsiologii mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. Moscow: Telekom, 2017. 
  25. Tsygankov, P. A. (ed.) Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia i mirovaia politika. Moscow: Iurait, 2015. 
  26. Tunkin, G. I. Voprosy teorii mezhdunarodnogo prava. Moscow: Zertsalo, 2009. 
  27. Urry, J. Ofshory. Moscow: Delo, 2017. 
  28. Weibel, P. “Teorii nasiliia: Ben’iamin, Freid, Shmitt, Derrida, Adorno,” LOGOS, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2018, pp. 261–279.
PDF, ru

Keywords: international relations, social justice, violence, hierarchy of regulatory formats, international law

Available in the on-line version with: 31.12.2020

To cite this article
Number 2, 2019