An Indicative Approach in Assessing the State Policy of the Russian Federation in the Field of Student Physical Education

Abstract

The focus of this article is the state policy of the Russian Federation in the fi eld of physical education of undergraduate students. The subject of the study is an indicative assessment of this public policy from the perspective of an integrative approach. The author raises the question of the validity of the current quality indicator, enshrined in regulatory legal acts, of the implementation of state policy in the fi eld of undergraduate physical education. Based on an analysis of the strategic objectives and the regulatory framework of this policy as well as the characteristics of the infl uence of students’ physical education on human capital indicators, the article demonstrates the unsatisfactory quality of the selection of quality indicators for the implementation of state policy. As an alternative, the author proposes to consider the quality of the formation at the university of a motivational-value attitude among students towards physical education and sports. The article further describes the methodology for assessing this indicator, which is based on the use of sociological survey methods and mathematical modeling. The author concludes by presenting the results of testing this methodology using the example of Lomonosov Moscow State University.

References

1. Barabashev, A. G., Makarov, A. A., and Makarov, I. A. “O sovershenstvovanii indikativnykh otsenok kachestva gosudarstvennogo upravleniia,” Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniia, No. 2, 2019, pp. 7–38. 
2. Gilev, G. A., Borisova, I. V., Katkova, A. M., and Rumiantseva, S. V. “Formirovanie deistvennoi politiki fi zicheskogo vospitaniia studencheskoi molodezhi,” Nauka i shkola, No. 2, 2017, pp. 201–204. 
3. Green, K. Can Physical Education Be Effective and, if so, how? Paper presented at the Consensus Conference Children, Youth and Physical Activity, (Copenhagen, Denmark, 2014, April), URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301552176_ Can_physical_education_be_eff ective_and_if_so_how 
4. Green, K., Cale, L., and Harris, J. “Re-imagination and Re-design in Physical Education: Implicit and Explicit Models in England and Wales,” Redesigning Physical Education: An Equity Agenda in Which Every Child Matters, ed. H.A. Lawson. Abington: Routledge, 2018, pp. 156–170. 
5. Pozdniakova, A. E. “Otsenivanie gosudarstvennoi politiki i proektov kak sposob opredeleniia ikh eff ektivnosti,” Obshchestvo: politika, ekonomika, parvo, No. 3, 2017, pp. 64–67. 
6. Sergeev, A. V. “Sovremennye determinanty gosudarstvennoi politiki Rossii po formirovaniiu fi zicheskoi kul’tury studentov,” Pravo i politika, No. 3, 2018, pp. 14–21. 
7. Sokol’skaia, M. V., and Tkachenko, A. V. “Zdorov’e professionala kak sotsial’noekonomicheskaia kategoriia,” Zdorov’e i obrazovanie v XXI veke, No. 2, 2016, pp. 807–811. 
8. Stoliarov, V. I. Sovremennaia sistema fi zicheskogo vospitaniia (poniatie, struktura, metody). Saratov: Izdatel’skii tsentr «Nauka», 2013. S. 9–13. 
9. Sulakshin, S. S. Sovremennaia gosudarstvennaia politika i upravlenie: Kurs lektsii. Moscow: Direkt-Media, 2013. 
10. Tolstova, Iu. N. “Matematicheskie metody — faktory sviazi estestvennykh i sotsial’no-gumanitarnykh nauk (sotsiologii),” Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, No. 10, 2015, pp. 12–21.