ISSN 0868-4871
En Ru
ISSN 0868-4871
Features of the Formation of Political Subjectivity among Modern Russian Youth

Features of the Formation of Political Subjectivity among Modern Russian Youth

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of the process of formation of political subjectivity in modern Russian youth. At the beginning of the 21st century, under conditions of economic growth and the expansion of democratic freedoms, the political subjectivity of young people has becomes a topic of urgent public discourse. The desire of the Russian state to be an independent player in the international arena has led to a need to strengthen trust between the government and society. Building a constructive dialogue between the state and youth implies considering the younger generation as a signifi cant subject of socio-political relations. As a result of this analysis, the author concludes that the country has created appropriate mechanisms for constructive interaction between the authorities and young people, but due to changes in socio-political reality, they require regular modernization. Accordingly, the process of forming the political subjectivity of modern Russian youth is changing.

References

  1. Almond, G., and Verba, S. Grazhdanskaia kul’tura. Politicheskie ustanovki i demokratiia v piati stranakh. Moscow: Mysl’, 2014. 
  2. Brodovskaia, E. V., Dombrovskaia, A. Iu., and Siniakov, A. V. “Politicheskaia sub’’ektnost’ pol’zovatelei sotsial’nykh setei v Rossii: rezul’taty vserossiiskogo sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniia,” Vestnik MGGU imeni M.A. Sholokhova. Seriia «Istoriia i politologiia», No. 2, 2015, pp. 80–87. 
  3. Chuev, S. V. (ed.) Tsennostnye orientatsii rossiiskoi molodezhi i realizatsiia gosudarstvennoi molodezhnoi politiki: rezul’taty issledovaniia: monografi ia. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom GUU, 2017. 
  4. Gavrilov, Iu. I., Kharchenko, V. V., Nekhaev, V. V. “Molodezhnaia politika: poiski eff ektivnykh reshenii,” Rossiiskaia molodezh’: problemy i resheniia, ed. F. E. Sheregi. Moscow: Tsentr sotsial’nogo prognozirovaniia, 2005, pp. 561–580. 
  5. Gnidina, Iu. A. Sub”ektnost’ lichnosti kak uslovie razvitiia gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva: monografi ia. Balashikha: De-Po, 2010. 
  6. Gomerov, I. N. “Sub”ekt kak smyslovoe iadro politicheskoi sub”ektnosti,” Razvitie territorii, No. 3, 2015, pp. 51–62. 
  7. Gorshkov, M. K. (ed.) Rossiia reformiruiushchaiasia: Ezhegodnik, Vol. 15. Moscow: Novyi Khronograf, 2017. 
  8. Grachev, M. N. Politika: kommunikatsionnoe izmerenie. Tula: Izdatel’stvo TGPU imeni L.N. Tolstogo, 2011. 
  9. Khunagov, R. D. Politicheskaia sub”ektnost’. Rostov-na-Donu: Izdatel’stvo IuFU, 1994. 
  10. Konurov, A. I., and Budylin, K. Iu. “Sub”ektnost’ kak politologicheskaia kategoriia,” Vlast’, No. 6, 2012, pp. 148–152. 
  11. Lukov, V. A., Lukov, S. V., and Pogorskii, E. K. “Innovatsionnyi potentsial novykh pokolenii i molodezhnaia politika na sovremennom etape razvitiia obshchestva,” Polit-Book, No. 2, 2014, pp. 6–18. 
  12. Mead, M. Kul’tura i mir detstva: Izbrannye proizvedeniia, ed. I. S. Kon; transl. Iu. A. Aseeva. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. 
  13. Petukhov, V. V., Barash, R. E., Sedova, N. N., and Petukhov, R. V. “Grazhdanskii aktivizm v Rossii: motivatsiia, tsennosti i formy uchastiia,” Vlast’, No. 9, 2014, pp. 11–19. 
  14. Samsonova, T. N. “O stanovlenii politicheskoi sub”ektnosti rossiiskoi molodezhi v protsesse politicheskoi sotsializatsii,” Obshchestvo: sotsiologiia, psikhologiia, pedagogika, No. 7, 2018, pp. 28–24. 
  15. Semigin, G. Iu. “Sub”ekty politiki,” Politicheskaia entsiklopediia, Vol. 2, ed. G. Iu. Semigin. Moscow: Mysl’, 1999, pp. 177. 
  16. Shevchenko, A. A. “Politicheskaia sub”ektnost’: fi losofsko-normativnyi analiz,” Vestnik Rossiiskogo gumanitarnogo nauchnogo fonda, No. 4, 2010, pp. 70–76. 
  17. Zubok, Iu. A., and Sorokin, O. V. “Formirovanie politicheskogo soznaniia rossiiskoi molodezhi i obuslavlivaiushchie ego protivorechiia,” Sotsiologiia vlasti, No. 4, 2010, pp. 6–15.
PDF, ru

Keywords: young generation, power, subjectivity, political subjectivity, political consciousness, political action, socio-political participation

Available in the on-line version with: 31.12.2020

To cite this article
Number 6, 2019