Buddhism and Regional Political Order: The Overall Context for East Asia

Abstract

In this article the author attempts to determine the place and role of Buddhism in the process of building a regional political order in the late 19th and early 20th centuries by identifying key characteristics that refl ect the specifi cs of the East Asian region. Contrary to the conventional belief of the universality of state and legal institutions — which, according to Francis Fukuyama’s prediction, was to take place with “all human societies” — the region under study demonstrated its own value-ideological attitudes. Buddhism was never perceived by the people of East Asia exclusively from a religious, sacral position. It was a way of thinking and living that undoubtedly fi gured in the development of state institutions as well. Although in a closer study of the principles of power, place, and the role of the head of state and his relationship with the Sangha diff ered in the tradition of Hinayana (South-East Asia) and Mahayana (North-East Asia), the author provides a set of characteristics typical of any existing current in Buddhism which played a decisive role in the question of its infl uence on the regional political order. An important feature of the region was the presence of predominantly nationstates, which meant that religion played a signifi cant role in forming the identity of the subjects of each state, who felt themselves guardians of ancient traditions, culture and language. Buddhism allowed the peoples of the region to be perceived as part of a whole, and above all, by these peoples themselves — a concept that Japan took advantage of by declaring an ambitious project to create a “Greater East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere.” Playing on cultural and spiritual contradictions and the opposition of “European” to “Asian,” the Japanese managed to achieve signifi cant success in implementing this project in a short period of time, which was greatly facilitated by Buddhism itself and its most active minions both in Japan and on the continent.

References

1. Brzezinski, Z. Velikaia shakhmatnaia doska. Moscow: AST, 2018. 
2. Day, T. Fluid Iron: State Formation in Southeast Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2002. 
3. Dong, Zh. “Buddhism, Nationalism and War: A Comparative Evaluation of Chinese and Japanese Buddhists’ Reactions to the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945),” International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, Vol. 4, No. 5, 2014, pp. 372–377. 
4. Fukuyama, F. Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Girouz, 2014. 
5. Gassner, F. The Comparative Study between Buddhism and Christanity on Peace and War: Dissertação fi nal / Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculdade De Teologia, Lisboa, 2015. 
6. Gokhale, B. G. “Early Buddhism and the Urban Revolution,” The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1982, pp. 7–22. 
7. Huntington, S. Politicheskii poriadok v meniaiushchikhsia obshchestvakh. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiia, 2004. 
8. Keown, D. (ed.) Buddhism and Abortion. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1998. 
9. Keyes, Ch. F. “Buddhists Confront the State,” Buddhism, Modernity, and the State in Asia: Forms of Engagement, eds. J. Whalen-Bridge, and P. Kitiarsa. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, pp. 17–41. 
10. Manandhar, T. Buddhist Perception of Monarchy and Its Relevance in Nepal’s Politics: A Paper Presented at the Seminar “Buddhism and the Crises of Nation-States in Asia”. Singapore: Faculty of Arts & Social Science, National University of Singapore, 2008. 
11. Mathou, T. “Bhutan: Political Reform in a Buddhist Monarchy,” Journal of Bhutan Studies, Vol. 1, No 1, 1999, pp. 114–145. 
12. McMahan, D. L. (ed.) Buddhism in the Modern World. London; New York: Routledge, 2012. 
13. Mikhalev, A. V. “Politicheskoe prisutstvie — genealogiia kontsepta,” Mirovaia politika, No. 2, 2019, pp. 33–42. 
14. Panov, P. V. Politicheskii poriadok: problema kontseptualizatsii i institutsionalizatsii: Thesis. Moscow, 2011. 
15. Pettibone, Ch. D. The Organization and Order or Battle of Militaries in World War II, Vol. 7: Germany’s and Imperial Japan’s Allies & Puppet States. Victoria: Traff ord, 2012. 
16. Schumm, D. Y., and Stoltzfus, M. Disability and World Religions: An Introduction. Waco: Baylor University Press, 2016. 
17. Sompong, S. “Thai Law and Buddhist Law,” The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 46, No. 1, 1998, pp. 69–86.