ISSN 0868-4871
En Ru
ISSN 0868-4871
The Conceptual Space of Modern Media Studies: The Political Science Dimension

The Conceptual Space of Modern Media Studies: The Political Science Dimension

Abstract

The dynamic change in the realities of the modern world has led to, among other things, the transformation of the political resource of the mass media. The mass media has a much greater infl uence on the political process today than it did at the end of the last century. Major changes have taken place both in the functioning of the press and in the discourse in which it is customary to consider it. In this regard, this article is devoted to the analysis of terms that have become quite popular and in demand in a short time, despite the fact that they are relatively new to the categorical corpus of political communication studies. Having studied the content of the most frequently cited works in the “Science Index” system (RSCI: Russian Science Citation Index) that touch on these subjects, the author identifi es the main meanings attached to the concepts of “post-truth” and “ fake”; identifi es similarities and diff erences between disinformation and misinformation, verifi cation and factchecking; and formulates specifi c ways to counter the manipulative infl uence of the mass media on the audience.

References

  1. Beinenson, V. A. “Proverka dostovernosti informatsii v usloviiakh novykh media: problemy i vozmozhnosti,” Zhurnalistika v sisteme al’ternativnykh istochnikov informatsii: Sbornik materialov nauchnoi konferentsii kafedry zhurnalistiki, 14 marta 2017 goda, ed. O. N. Savinova. Nizhnii Novgorod: Nizhegorodskii gosudarstvennyi universitet imeni N.I. Lobachevskogo, 2017, pp. 79–89. 
  2. Beliaev, D. Razrukha v golovakh. Informatsionnaia voina protiv Rossii. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2015.
  3. Borzova, M. S. “Rol’ faktchekinga v sovremennoi zhurnalistike,” Kommunikatsiia v sovremennom mire: Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, ed. V. V. Tulupova. Voronezh: Voronezhskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 2017, pp. 5–7. 
  4. Chugrov, S. V. “Post-truth: transformatsiia politicheskoi real’nosti ili samorazrushenie liberal’noi demokratii?” Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, No. 2, 2017, pp. 42–59. 
  5. Gottfried, J. A., Hardy, B. W., Winneg, K. M., and Jamieson, K. H. “Did Fact Checking Matter in the 2012 Presidential Campaign?” American Behavioral Scientists, Vol. 57, No. 11, 2013, pp. 1558–1567. 
  6. Ivanova, E. A. “Lingvisticheskii fenomen postpravdy v angloiazychnom politicheskom diskurse,” Vestnik Cheliabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, No. 9, 2017, pp. 154–159. 
  7. Konovalov, V. N. Politologiia: Slovar’. Moscow: RGU. 2010. 
  8. Kornev, M. S. “Faktcheking: 5 nadezhnykh sposobov proverit’ informatsiiu,” Zhurnalist, No. 5, 2015, pp. 54–56. 
  9. Koshkarova, N. N. “Feikovye novosti: kreativnoe reshenie ili moshennichestvo?” Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, No. 2, 2018, pp. 14–18. 
  10. Koshkarova, N. N., and Ruzhentseva, N. B. “Na puti k pravde, vedushchem ko lzhi: fenomen postpravdy v sovremennoi politicheskoi kommunikatsii,” Politicheskaia lingvistika, No. 1, 2019, pp. 50–56. 
  11. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N. et al. “Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Infl uence and Successful Debiasing,” Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2012, pp. 106–131. 
  12. Pariser, E. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin Press, 2011. 
  13. Ruzhentseva, N. B., and Koshkarova, N. N. “Politicheskaia provokatsiia: lingvisticheskii kommentarii nedostovernykh soobshchenii,” Uchimsia ponimat’ Rossiiu: politicheskaia i massmediinaia kommunikatsiia, ed. A. P. Chudinov. Ekaterinburg: Ural’skii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii universitet, 2018, pp. 225–230. 
  14. Samoshkin, E. A. “Instituty bor’by s dezinformatsiei i misinformatsiei v SMI,” Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 10. Zhurnalistika, No. 6, 2017, pp. 176–190. 
  15. Silverblatt, A. “Media Literacy and Critical Thinking,” International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2018, pp. 66–71. 
  16. Sokolova, D. V. “Faktcheking i verifikatsiia informatsii v rossiiskikh SMI: rezul’taty oprosa,” Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 10. Zhurnalistika, No. 4, 2018, pp. 3–25. 
  17. Volodina, L. V. “Post-truth kak antiteza dostovernosti v mediinom tekste,” Sovremennaia periodicheskaia pechat’ v kontekste kommunikativnykh protsessov, No. 2, 2017, pp. 57–62. 
  18. Wintersieck, A. “Debating the Truth: The Impact of Fact-Checking During Electoral Debates,” American Politics Research, Vol. 45, No. 2, 2017, pp. 304–311. 
  19. Young, D. G., Jamieson, K. H., Poulsen, S., and Goldring, A. “Fact-Checking Effectiveness as a Function of Format and Tone: Evaluating FactCheck.org and FlackCheck.org,” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, Vol. 95, No. 1, 2017, pp. 49–75. 
  20. Zholud’, R. V. “ ‘Era postpravdy’ v zapadnoi zhurnalistike: prichiny i posledstviia,” Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Filologiia. Zhurnalistika, No. 3, 2018, pp. 117–123. 
  21. Zorina, E. G. “Osobennosti postreal’nosti i ikh vliianie na politicheskoe prostranstvo,” Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 12. Politicheskie nauki, No. 4, 2018, pp. 91–98.
PDF, ru

Keywords: mass media, post-truth, fake, disinformation, fact-checking, media literacy

Available in the on-line version with: 31.12.2020

To cite this article
Number 4, 2020