Non-Governmental Organizations in International Relations: The Decline of the Concept of Civil Society

Abstract

This article sets out to solve the scholarly problem of determining the place of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in current international relations and their role and relations with states. The author analyzes the concept of civil society, the starting point in the study of modern NGOs over the past 30 years, and considers by turns (1) the problems of defi ning the concepts of NGOs and civil society; and (2) the formation of these concepts in connection with the transformation of the system of international relations in the early 1990s and the policy of the Western countries in the post-Soviet space. He goes on to conclude that that civil society in the modern Western liberal reading should be considered as a historical phenomenon without any claim to universal signifi cance. The article addresses the current foreign policy practice of the United States and the European Union in working with NGOs, noting that Western states and private foundations are losing their monopoly position in the fi eld of NGOs as other states master this tool and create their own infrastructure for working with it on the domestic and foreign political circuit. The further development of the NGO sphere, the author concludes, will be aff ected by the processes of increasing interstate competition and regionalization.

References

1. Aksartova, S. “Promoting Civil Society or Diff using NGOs,” Globalization, Philanthropy, and Civil Society, eds. S. Heydemann, and D. Hemmack. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2009, pp. 160–191. 
2. Aksartova, S. “Why NGOs? How American Donors Embraced Civil Society after the Cold War,” The International Journal of Not-for-Profi t Law, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2006, pp. 15–21. 
3. Almond, G., and Verba, S. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. London: Sage, 1989. 
4. Baldus, J. Legal Foreign Funding Restrictions on Civil Society Organizations Worldwide. Frankfurt a/M: Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, 2015, URL: https://www. hsfk.de/fi leadmin/HSFK/hsfk_downloads/prif137_table_Update2019.pdf 
5. Barbière, C. “European Court of Auditors Calls for NGO Defi nition,” Euractiv, December 20, 2018, URL: https://www.euractiv.com/section/development-policy/news/european-court-of-auditors-calls-for-ngo-definition/ 
6. Bogaturov, A. D. “ ‘Strategiia peremalyvaniia’ vo vneshnei politike SShA,” Bogaturov, A. D., Kosolapov, N. A., Khrustalev, M. A. Ocherki teorii i metodologii politicheskogo analiza mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. Moscow: NOFMO, 2002, pp. 356–372. 
7. Buyse, A. “Squeezing Civic Space: Restrictions on Civil Society Organizations and the Linkages with Human Rights,” The International Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 22, No. 8, 2018, pp. 966–988. 
8. Carothers, T. “Democracy Aid at 25: Time to Choose,” Journal of Democracy, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2015, pp. 59–73. 
9. Davies, T. NGOs: A New History of Transnational Civil Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. 
10. Divjak, T., and Forbici, G. The Future Evolution of Civil Society in the European Union by 2030. Brussels: European Economic and Social Committee, 2017, URL: https:// www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/fi les/fi les/qe-04-17-886-en-n.pdf 
11. Evers, A., and Laville, J. The Third Sector in Europe. London: Edward Elgar Press, 2004. 
12. Fukuyama, F. “Why Is Democracy Performing So Poorly?” Journal of Democracy, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2015, pp. 11–20. 
13. Gershman, C., and Allen, M. “The Assault on Democracy Assistance,” Journal of Democracy, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2006, pp. 36–51. 
14. Hansmann, H. “The Role of Nonprofi t Enterprise,” The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 89, No. 5, 1980, pp. 835–902. 
15. Kapustin, B. G. Kritika politicheskoi fi losofi i. Moscow: Territoriia budushchego, 2010. 
16. Kim, Y. “How NGOs Infl uence US Foreign Aid Allocations,” Foreign Policy Analysis, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2017, pp. 112–132. 
17. Kochetkov, A. P. “Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v fokuse politicheskoi nauki (istoriografi cheskii obzor),” Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 12. Politicheskie nauki, No. 1, 2014, pp. 29–51. 
18. Lake, A. From Containment to Enlargement: Remarks at School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University. September 21, 1993. Washington: Johns Hopkins University, 1993. 
19. Lawson, M., and Epstein, S. Democracy Promotion: An Objective of U.S. Foreign Assistance. Washington: Congressional Research Service, 2019, URL: https://fas.org/ sgp/crs/row/R44858.pdf 
20. Lipset, S. “The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 59, No. 1, 1994, pp. 1–22. 
21. Mann, M. Vlast’ v XXI stoletii: besedy s Dzhonom A. Khollom [J. Hall]. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2014. 
22. Pogorel’skaia, S. V. Nepravitel’stvennye organizatsii i politicheskie fondy vo vneshnei politike FRG. Moscow: Nauka, 2007. 
23. Putnam, R., Leonardi, R., and Nanetti, R. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1994. 
24. “Recent Laws and Legislative Proposals to Restrict Civil Society and Civil Society Organizations,” International Journal of Not-for-Profi t Law, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2006, pp. 76–85. 
25. Salamon, L. “The Rise of the Nonprofi t Sector,” Foreign Aff airs, Vol. 73, No. 4, 1994, pp. 109. 
26. Salamon, L., Sokolowski, W., and Haddock, M. Explaining Civil Society Development: A Social Origins Approach. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2017. 
27. Sedaca, N., and Bouchet, N. Holding Steady? US Democracy Promotion in a Changing World. London: Chatham House, 2014, URL: https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/ files/home/chatham/public_html/sites/default/files/170214DemocracyPromotion.pdf 
28. Seligman, A. The Idea of Civil Society. New York: Free Press, 1992. 
29. Sgueo, G. Financial Accountability of Civil Society Organisations Improving Cooperation with EU Institutions. Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service, 2015, URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_IDA(2015)556992 
30. Shapovalova, N., and Youngs, R. “The Changing Nature of EU Support to Civil Society,” Civil Society and Democracy Promotion, eds. T. Beichelt, I. Hahn-Fuhr, F. Schimmelfennig, and S. Worschech. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, pp. 86–109. 
31. Suchkov, M. A. “NPO kak instrument vneshnei politiki SShA (na primere gosudarstv Iuzhnogo Kavkaza),” Vestnik Instituta strategicheskikh issledovanii PGLU, No. 3, 2012, pp. 19–23. 
32. Sutyrin, V. V. “Transformatsiia Vostochnogo partnerstva ES posle 2014 goda,” Sovremennaia Evropa, No. 2, 2020, pp. 111–122. 
33. Trister, S. Investing in Freedom: Democracy Support in the U.S. Budget. Washington: Freedom House, 2013, URL: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/fi les/Policy%20 61 Brief%207-22-13%20Investing%20in%20Freedom%20-Democracy%20Support%20 in%20the%20U.S.%20Budget.pdf 
34. Turtelboom, A., Wernerus, D., Hiernaux-Fritsch, S. at al. Transparency of EU Funds Implemented by NGOs: More Eff ort Needed. Luxembourg: European Court of Auditors, 2018. URL: https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/SR18_35/ SR_NGO_FUNDING_EN.pdf 
35. Zaleski, P. “Tocqueville on Civilian Society: A Romantic Vision of the Dichotomic Structure of Social Reality,” Archiv für Begriff sgeschichte, Vol. 50, 2008, S. 260–266. 
36. Zaleski, P. Neoliberalizm i spoleczenstwo obywatelskie. Torun: Wydawnictwo UMK, 2012.