Implementation of International Transport Projects in Kyrgyzstan: Prospects of Construction of the China–Kyrgyzstan–Uzbekistan Railroad

Abstract

The construction of international transport corridors connecting the Asia Pacifi c region and the European Union certainly contribute to integration processes as well as stimulate the development of states along these routes. At the same time, it is obvious that the international transport corridors pose a distinct threat to small states, since they are a tool of infl uence or control. In particular, plans to build a China–Kyrgyzstan–Uzbekistan railroad, which have been discussed periodically for more than 20 years, may be considered in this light. This article addresses the main challenges and prospects for the Kyrgyz Republic related to the implementation of the China–Kyrgyzstan–Uzbekistan railroad project. In addition, the author discusses the results of other international transport projects implemented in the territory of the Kyrgyz Republic. Two conclusions represent the main fi ndings of the study: (1) The construction of the China–Kyrgyzstan–Uzbekistan railroad will give impetus to the development and modernization of the transport infrastructure of the Kyrgyz Republic, notably in the context of breaking out of possible transport isolation; and (2) Special attention should be paid to the ecological and security issues connected with the construction and operation of the China–Kyrgyzstan–Uzbekistan railroad.

References

1. Akaev, A. Diplomatiia Shelkovogo puti. Bishkek: Uchkun, 1999. 
2. Cann, G. du. “Empire of Debt: China ‘Colonising Smaller Countries by Lending them Massive Amounts of Money They Can never Repay in Bid for World Domination’,” The Sun, August 17, 2018, URL: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/7037663/chinacolonising-smaller-countries-by-lending-them-massive-amounts-of-money-they-cannever- repay-in-bid-for-world-domination/ 
3. Lisovolik, Ia. D., Kuznetsov, A. S., and Berdigulova, A. R. Ezheme siachnyi makroobzor EABR. Ianvar’ 2017. Almaty: Evraziiskii bank razvitiia, 2017, URL: https:// eabr.org/upload/iblock/1d2/yanvar2017.pdf 
4. Lisovolik, Ia. D., Kuznetsov, A. S., Berdigulova, A. R., and Chernov, N. A. “Spetsial’nyi doklad: Ekonomicheskaia geografi ia stran Evrazii,” Lisovolik, Ia. D., Kuznetsov, A. S., and Berdigulova, A. R. Makroobzor EABR. Ianvar’ 2017: Strany EABR: Kurs na snizhenie infl iatsii. Moskva: Evraziiskii bank razvitiia, 2017, URL: http://eurasian-studies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Makro_obzor_EABR_03.02.pdf 
5. Prekrasnye perspektivy i prakticheskie deistviia po sovmestnomu sozdaniiu ekonomicheskogo poiasa Shelkovogo puti i Morskogo Shelkovogo puti XXI veka, ed. Goskomitet po delam razvitiia i reform, Ministerstvo inostrannykh del i i Ministerstvo kommertsii KNR. Pekin: Izdatel’stvo literatury na inostrannykh iazykakh KNR, 2015, URL: http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/rus/zxxx/t1254925.shtml 
6. Ruta, M., Dappe, M. H., Lall, S., Zhang, C. et al. Belt and Road Economics: Opportunities and Risks of Transport Corridors. Washington: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 2019. 
7. Shermatova, S. “Ekonomicheskii poias Novogo shelkovogo puti: vozmozhnosti dlia Tsentral’noi Azii,” Tsentral’no-Aziatskii ekspertnyi klub “Evraziiskoe razvitie”, December 19, 2015, URL: http://eurazvitiye.org/publication/20151219 
8. Usubaliev, N., and Muratalieva, N. ‘Kitaiskii faktor’ vo vneshei politike Kyrgyzstana: dvustoronnii i regional’nyi urovni. Bishkek: KRSU Press, 2010. 
9. Venables, A. “Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage, Transport Costs, and Trade,” The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2001, pp. 451–479.