ISSN 0868-4871
En Ru
ISSN 0868-4871
Конфигурация сфер взаимоотношений и взаимовлияния политических партий и общественных движений

Конфигурация сфер взаимоотношений и взаимовлияния политических партий и общественных движений

Аннотация

В статье представлен обзор различных аспектов во взаимоотношениях политических партий и социальных движений, формирующих стимулы, стратегии и результаты союзов между ними. Электоральный аспект ха- рактеризует, как движения мобилизуют электорат для партий. Государ- ственный и политико-парламентский аспект — предоставление партиями возможности движениям влиять на принимаемые законы. Аспект повестки дня и лоббирования — возможность для движений реализовывать свои интересы с помощью партий и использование партиями и движениями друг друга с целью привлечения общественного внимания к конкретным проблемам. Аспект идентичности — культивирование и распространение социальных идентичностей в результате союза партий и движений. Аспект состязательной политики — помощь партий движениям, когда последние действуют в интересах партий, но непарламентскими методами. Аспект протестов и «уличной политики» — представление партиями движений в парламенте взамен на представление движениями партий на улице. Аспект внешнего контекста и кризисов — помощь движений партиям для консо- лидации общества или полный переход этой прерогативы к движениям. Аспект автократического контекста и демократических преобразований — трансформация отношений движений и партий в автократиях, переходных режимах, новых и устоявшихся демократиях. Данные взаимодействия характеризуются регулярным обменом и «бартером» членств, поддержки, ресурсов, смыслов и, конечно же, власти между акторами различной степени институализации. Было выявлено, что подобные союзы рано или поздно характеризуются попытками союзников подчинить, кооптировать и инструментализировать друг друга, навязать союзнику свой идейно-про- граммный базис и структурную модель.

Литература

  1. Almeida P. Social Movement Partyism: Collective Action and Political Parties // Strategic Alliances: Social Movement Coalitions / Eds. N. van Dyke, H. McCammon. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010. P. 170–196. 
  2. Amenta E. When Movements Matter: The Townsend Plan and the Rise of Social Security. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006. 
  3. Amenta E., Young M. Making an Impact: The Conceptual and Methodological Implications of the Collective Benefi ts Criterion // How Social Movements Matter / Eds. M. Giugni, D. McAdam, Ch. Tilly. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999. P. 22–41. 
  4. Amenta E., Caren N., Chiarello E., Su Y. The Political Consequences of Social Movements // Annual Review of Sociology. 2010. Vol. 36. P. 287–307. 
  5. Banaszak A. Inside and Outside the State: Movement Insider Status, Tactics, and Public Policy Achievements // Routing the Opposition: Social Movements, Public Policy, and Democracy / Eds. D.S. Meyer, V. Jenness, H. Ingram. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005. P. 149–176. 
  6. Berry J. The New Liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups. Washington: Brookings Institution, 1999. Beyers J. Voice and Access: Political Practices of European Interest Associations // European Union Politics. 2004. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 211–240. 
  7. Bohm T. Activists in Politics: The Infl uence of Embedded Activists on the Success of Social Movements // Social Problems. 2015. Vol. 62. No. 4. P. 477–498. 
  8. Burnstein P., Einwohner R., Hollander J. The Success of Political Movements: A Bargaining Perspective // The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social / Eds. C. Jenkins, B. Klandermans. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995. P. 275–295. 
  9. Burstein P. Social Movements and Public Policy // How Social Movements Matter / Eds. M. Giugni, D. McAdam, Ch. Tilly. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999. P. 3–21. 
  10. Chironi D., Fittipaldi R. Social Movements and New Forms of Political Irganization: Podemos as a Hybrid Party // The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies. 2017. Vol. 10. No. 1. P. 275–305. 
  11. Cisar O., Vrablikova K. At the Parliament or in the Streets? Issue Composition of Contentious Politics in the Visegrad Countries: Paper prepared for the ECPR General Conference (Université de Montréal, 26–29 August 2015). URL: https://www.academia.edu/16549661 
  12. Crabtree J. Democracy without Parties? Some Lessons from Peru // Journal of Latin American Studies. 2010. Vol. 42. No. 2. P. 357–382. 
  13. Crabtree J. Patterns of Protest: Politics and Social Movements in Bolivia. London: Latin America Bureau, 2005. 
  14. Della Porta D., Fernandez J., Kouki H., Mosca L. Movement Parties. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2017. 
  15. Diani M. Social Movements and Social Capital: A Network Perspective on Movement Outcomes // Mobilization. 1995. Vol. 2. No. 2. P. 129–147. 
  16. Diani M. The Concept of Social Movement // The Sociological Review. 1992. Vol. 40. No. 1. P. 1–25. 
  17. Dyke N. van. Protest Cycles and Party Politics: The Eff ects of Elite Allies and Antagonists on Student Protest in the United States, 1930–1990 // States, Parties, and Social Movements / Ed. J. Goldstone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. P. 226–245. 
  18. Gamson W. The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood: Dorsey, 1990. 
  19. Gamson W., Wolfsfeld G. Movements and media as interacting systems // Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1993. Vol. 528. P. 114–125. 
  20. Goldstone J. Introduction: Bridging Institutionalized and Noninstitutionalized Politics // States, Parties, and Social Movements / Ed. J. Goldstone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. P. 1–24. 
  21. Grey S. Can We Measure the Infl uence of Social Movements? Working paper, Political Science Program Seminar (September 18, 2002). URL: https://openresearchrepository. anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/41810/4/sandragrey.pdf 
  22. Heaney M., Rojas F. Partisans, Nonpartisans, and the Antiwar Movement in the United States // American Politics Research. 2007. Vol. 35. No. 4. P. 431–464. 
  23. Hutter S., Kriesi H., Lorenzini J. Social Movements in Interaction with Political Parties // The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements / Eds. D. Snow, S. Soule, H. Kriesi, H. McCammon. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2018. P. 322–337. 
  24. Kitschelt H. Landscapes of Political Interest Intermediation. Social Movements, Interest Groups, and Parties in the Early Twenty-First Century // Social Movements and Democracy / Ed. P. Ibarra. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. P. 81–104. 
  25. Kitschelt H. New Social Movements and the Decline of Party Organization // Challenging the Political Order / Eds. D. Russell, M. Keuechler. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990. P. 179–208. 
  26. Kitschelt H. Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies // British Journal of Political Science. 1986. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 57–95. 
  27. Kitschelt H. The Logics of Party Formation. Ecological Politics in Belgium and West Germany. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989. 
  28. Kollman K. Outside Lobbying. Public Opinion & Interest Group Strategies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998. 
  29. Koopmans R. Social Movements // The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior / Eds. R. Dalton, H. Klingemann. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. P. 693–707. 
  30. Kriesi H. Party Systems, Electoral Systems, and Social Movements // The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements / Eds. D. Della Porta, M. Diani. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. P. 667–680. 
  31. Kriesi H. The Political Opportunity Structure of the Dutch Peace Movement // West European Politics. 1989. Vol. 12. P. 295–312. 
  32. Kriesi H., Wisler D. Social Movements and Direct Democracy in Switzerland // European Journal of Political Research. 1996. Vol. 30. No. 1. P. 19–40. 
  33. Kriesi H., Koopmans R., Duyvendak J., Giugni M. New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995. 
  34. Lee Y. Diverging Patterns of Democratic Representations in Korea and Taiwan: Political Parties and Social Movements // Asian Survey. 2014. Vol. 54. No. 3. P. 419–444. 
  35. McAdam D., Tarrow S. Ballots and Barricades: On the Reciprocal Relationship between Elections and Social Movements // Perspectives on Politics. 2010. Vol. 8. No. 2. P. 529–542. 
  36. McAdam D., Tarrow S. Social Movements and Elections: Toward a Broader Understanding of the Political Context of Contention // The Future of Social Movement Research: Dynamics, Mechanisms, and Processes / Eds. J. Van Stekelenburg, C. Rogeband, B. Klandermans. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013. P. 325–346. 
  37. McAdam D., McCarthy D., Zald N. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. 
  38. McCarthy J., Zald N. Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory // American Journal of Sociology. 1977. Vol. 82. No. 6. P. 1212–1241. 
  39. Nogueira A. Institutionalization of Rural Social Movements in the Lula Government and the Decline of Land Reform in Brazil: Co-option, Political Identity, and Agency // Analise Social. 2018. Vol. 53. No. 227. P. 362–387. 
  40. Norris P. Political Activism: New Challenges, New Opportunities // The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics / Eds. C. Boix, S. Stokes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. P. 628–652. 
  41. Oliver P., Maney G. Political Processes and Local Newspaper Coverage of Protest Events: From Selection Bias to Triadic Interactions // American Journal of Sociology. 2000. Vol. 106. No. 2. P. 463–505.
  42. Olzak S., Soule S. Cross-Cutting Inf luences of Environmental Protest and Legislation // Social Forces. 2009. Vol. 88. No. 1. P. 201–225. 
  43. Piccio R. The Impact of Social Movements on Political Parties // The Consequences of Social Movements / Ed. L. Bosi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. P. 263–284. 
  44. Poguntke T. The New Politics Dimension in European Green Parties // New Politics in Western Europe. The Rise and Success of Green Parties and Alternative Lists / Ed. F. Müller-Rommel. Boulder: Westview, 1989. P. 175–194. 
  45. Rucht D. The EU as a Target of Mobilisation: Is There a Europeanisation of Confl ict? // L’Action collective en Europe / Eds. R. Balme, D. Chabanet, V. Wright. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 2002. P. 163–194. 
  46. Silke A., Berkel B., Pfetsch B. Media Opportunity Structures. A Brake Block for the Europeanisation of Public Spheres? // The Transformation of Political Mobilisation and Communication in European Public Spheres / Ed. D. Della Porta. Berlin: Wissensschafts zentrum Berlin, 2004. P. 243–246. 
  47. States, Parties, and Social Movements / Ed. J. Goldstone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 
  48. Suh D. Institutionalizing Social Movements: The Dual Strategy of the Korean Women’s Movement // The Sociological Quarterly. 2011. Vol. 52. No. 3. P. 442–471. 
  49. Tarrow S. Power in Movement. Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. 
  50. Tarrow S., and Tilly Ch. Contentious Politics and Social Movements // The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics / Eds. C. Boix, S. Stokes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. P. 435–461. 
  51. Tresch A., Fischer M. In Search of Political Infl uence: Outside Lobbying Behavior and Media Coverage of Social Movements, Interest Groups and Political Parties in Six Western European Countries // International Political Science Review. 2015. Vol. 36. No. 4. P. 355–372. 
  52. Zald N., McCarthy J. Social Movements in an Organizational Society. New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 1987.
Скачать в формате PDF

Ключевые слова: политические партии; партийная система; общественные движения; социальные движения; гражданский активизм; гражданское общество; публичная политика; состязательная политика

Доступно в on-line версии с: 31.12.2020

Для цитирования статьи
Номер 2, 2020